Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 12:31 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-04-17 @ 1:20 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05522361
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-02-07
First Post:
2022-05-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Risdiplam in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Previously Treated With Nusinersen
Sponsor:
Clinic for Special Children
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Risdiplam Exchange in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Previously and Exclusively Treated With Nusinersen
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RISE
Brief Summary:
Risdiplam Exchange (RISE) is a study of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients who crossover to 36 months of open-label risdiplam monotherapy following a comparable period of nusinersen treatment. The schedule of assessments (SOAs) carry over seamlessly for the cohort from studies done while treated with nusinersen and continue to track the most informative outcomes from that trial (e.g. nine hole peg test and grip strength), while adding the Box and Block Test (BBT) as an additional measure of upper limb endurance and function.
Detailed Description:
Risdiplam is an orally bioavailable small molecule that distributes into the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral tissues where it modifies SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing and increases tissue SMN protein levels. It was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for all SMA patients older than 2 months of age in August 2020.
Clinical trial data prompted us to consider risdiplam a reasonable alternative to nusinersen administered intrathecally or by subcutaneous intrathecal catheter (SIC) for patients with more advanced SMA. Considered within this clinical context, risdiplam presents a significant advantage by eliminating the risks of mechanical failure, intrathecal bleeding, and CNS infection associated with the SIC device. The schedule of assessments (SOAs) used in this cohort during the previous three-year period as part of a nusinersen study provide us with an established framework for data collection. Thus, the overall clinical experience with risdiplam as compared to nusinersen can be assessed using a prospective, crossover design in a real-world setting.
Clinical trial data prompted us to consider risdiplam a reasonable alternative to nusinersen administered intrathecally or by subcutaneous intrathecal catheter (SIC) for patients with more advanced SMA. Considered within this clinical context, risdiplam presents a significant advantage by eliminating the risks of mechanical failure, intrathecal bleeding, and CNS infection associated with the SIC device. The schedule of assessments (SOAs) used in this cohort during the previous three-year period as part of a nusinersen study provide us with an established framework for data collection. Thus, the overall clinical experience with risdiplam as compared to nusinersen can be assessed using a prospective, crossover design in a real-world setting.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: