Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-06-16 @ 6:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02371395
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-10-23
First Post:
2015-02-19
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Validation of RealAmp Method for the Diagnosis of Malaria in Endemic Areas of Brazil
Sponsor:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Validation of RealAmp Method for the Diagnosis of Malaria in Endemic Areas of Brazil
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Worldwide, approximately 2 billion people live in areas at risk for malaria with morbidity surpassing 250 million cases, with approximately 800,000 deaths, per year. Of the four species of malaria parasites that cause human infection, P. falciparum is responsible for the majority of severe malaria cases followed by P. vivax. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for prompt and correct treatment, which can reduce the death rate and interrupt transmission. Currently, conventional methods for the diagnosis of malaria include microscopic examination of thin and thick blood smears and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Light microscopy in practice typically detects parasitemia as low as 100 parasites/µl and it can differentiate species. The advantage of microscopy includes the ability to estimate parasitemia, the possibility to identify parasite stages, including gametocytes, and its low cost. However, this method is labor intensive, difficult to standardize, and requires well-trained microscopists. The majority of RDTs are based on detection of P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2) antigen and do not detect all malaria species. RDTs that detect lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) and aldolase generally broadly react with all four species of malaria parasites and therefore cannot differentiate among the species although efforts are underway to improve their performance for species detection. In settings where multiple malaria species co-circulate, molecular methods may be more reliable than microscopy and RDTs in accurately diagnosing the species of malaria parasites with low parasitemias. However, conventional molecular methods, such as nested polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) or real-time PCR, are technically challenging and resource intensive and are generally restricted to reference laboratories due to the need for well-equipped laboratories. Recently, new molecular methods that can be used in field settings have been developed and this opens up new opportunities for exploring molecular tools for malaria diagnosis in endemic countries. With the objective of facilitating use of molecular tools for malaria control programs, the malaria laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, USA developed a simple isothermal molecular method called Real-Time Fluorescence Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RealAmp) for the diagnosis of malaria. Currently, RealAmp primers exist for detecting the Plasmodium genus and the detection of P. falciparum and P. vivax species. The RealAmp method has great potential as a molecular tool for the diagnosis of malaria in the field (and other infections of major public health impact, such as HIV and tuberculosis). It can provide an alternative to conventional PCR-based diagnostic methods for field use in clinical and operational programs. The objective of this proposal is to validate the sensitivity of RealAmp for detection of malaria parasites in blood spots from patients with clinical diagnosis of malaria in two endemic states of Brazil with co-circulation of P. falciparum and P. vivax. In this evaluation, RealAmp and microscopic examination will be compared to a real-time PCR method as a reference test.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: