Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:33 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-21 @ 11:18 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02981667
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-12-05
First Post:
2016-11-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Higher Enjoyment in Response to High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise
Sponsor:
Organization:
Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}, 'interventionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D000072696', 'term': 'High-Intensity Interval Training'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D064797', 'term': 'Physical Conditioning, Human'}, {'id': 'D015444', 'term': 'Exercise'}, {'id': 'D009043', 'term': 'Motor Activity'}, {'id': 'D009068', 'term': 'Movement'}, {'id': 'D009142', 'term': 'Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena'}, {'id': 'D055687', 'term': 'Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'PROSPECTIVE', 'observationalModel': 'CASE_CROSSOVER'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 12}, 'patientRegistry': False}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2015-09'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2016-11', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2015-12', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2016-12-02', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2016-11-29', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2016-12-02', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2016-12-05', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2016-12-05', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2015-12', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Physical activity enjoyment score (PACES)', 'timeFrame': 'This was measured 10 min post-exercise in all participants during the 3 mo of data collection.', 'description': "This is an 18-item categorical survey used to assess participants' enjoyment of the bout of physical activity that was just completed"}, {'measure': 'Oxygen uptake', 'timeFrame': 'Measured continuously during exercise during the 3 mo of data collection.', 'description': 'Oxygen uptake (VO2) represents mitochondrial consumption of oxygen to drive cellular metabolism generating ATP to support muscular contraction.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'conditions': ['Exercise Training']}, 'referencesModule': {'references': [{'pmid': '28076352', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0166299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166299. eCollection 2017.'}]}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'Previous research is equivocal concerning if high intensity interval training is viewed as more aversive versus moderate exercise. Our data in active men and women showed that interval training is viewed as more enjoyable than higher volume moderate exercise.', 'detailedDescription': 'Twelve men and women who were habitually active initially performed ramp exercise on a cycle ergometer to assess maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and peak power output (PPO), which was used to determine workload for the subsequent 2 bouts. They returned at least 48 h later at the same time of day to complete high intensity interval training (HIIT consisting of repeated 1 min bouts at 85 %PPO) or moderate intensity continuous training (MICT consisting of 25 min at 40 %PPO). During exercise, heart rate, oxygen uptake, perceived exertion, pleasure:displeasure, and blood lactate concentration were continuously assessed. Ten minutes post-exercise, physical activity enjoyment was measured. Data showed that despite higher oxygen uptake, heart rate, blood lactate concentration, and perceived exertion in HIIT, enjoyment was higher in HIIT versus MICT.'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['ADULT'], 'maximumAge': '45 Years', 'minimumAge': '18 Years', 'samplingMethod': 'NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'Habitually active young men and women ages 18-45 yr', 'healthyVolunteers': True, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Habitually active, healthy, non-obese\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Sedentary, unhealthy, joint pain precluding tolerance to exercise'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT02981667', 'briefTitle': 'Higher Enjoyment in Response to High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'California State University, San Marcos'}, 'officialTitle': 'Enjoyment Responses to High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': 'astorino1'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': 'Active men and women', 'description': 'Healthy, active men and women ages 18-45 yr completed 1 bout of high intensity interval training and moderate intensity continuous training in a randomized, crossover design.', 'interventionNames': ['Other: Exercise intensity']}], 'interventions': [{'name': 'Exercise intensity', 'type': 'OTHER', 'description': 'Participants were randomized to 1 or 2 exercise intensities, moderate or high (interval training).', 'armGroupLabels': ['Active men and women']}]}, 'ipdSharingStatementModule': {'ipdSharing': 'NO', 'description': 'Data are accepted for publication in PLoS One, an open-access journal, which makes the aggregate data available to all researchers.'}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'California State University, San Marcos', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'investigatorTitle': 'Professor, Dept. of Kinesiology', 'investigatorFullName': 'Todd A. Astorino Ph.D', 'investigatorAffiliation': 'California State University, San Marcos'}}}}