Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 3:33 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01122732
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-11-01
First Post:
2010-05-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Pain Relief After Non Stimulating Interscalene Catheter Placement vs Stimulating Catheter Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Sponsor:
Organization:
Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}, 'conditionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D010146', 'term': 'Pain'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D009461', 'term': 'Neurologic Manifestations'}, {'id': 'D012816', 'term': 'Signs and Symptoms'}, {'id': 'D013568', 'term': 'Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'PROSPECTIVE'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 85}, 'patientRegistry': False}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2010-08'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2016-10', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2015-09', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2016-10-31', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2010-05-11', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2010-05-12', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2016-11-01', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2010-05-13', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2015-09', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Pain', 'timeFrame': '2-3 days after surgery', 'description': 'Pain will be monitored over the next 2-3 days while subjects have catheter inplace. Sleep, total oral analgesic intake will be compared.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'keywords': ['nerve block', 'continuous catheter', 'shoulder surgery', 'pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty'], 'conditions': ['Pain', 'Shoulder', 'Arthroplasty']}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': '1. Interscalene continuous catheter is a very effective way of controlling pain in total shoulder arthroplasty. To ensure proper placement, nerve stimulating catheter is quite often used.\n2. Ultrasound can help proper placement of catheter without relying on nerve stimulation.\n3. The plan of the study is to compare two techniques head to head to see if they are equally effective or one is better than others.', 'detailedDescription': 'After consent patients will be randomized to one of the two groups: Control Group or the Experimental Group. Patients will be blinded to the group assignment. As both catheters are placed using almost the same technique, the subjects will be unable to tell type of catheter they will be getting..\n\nEvery procedure will be done after starting intravenous access and placing standard anesthesia monitors (EKG, Blood Pressure Cuff and Pulse-Ox) on the patients. For comfort care sedation will be titrated using accepted American Society of Anesthesiology and American society of Regional Anesthesia Guidelines.\n\nIn the Control Group the patient will have interscalene catheter placed using nerve stimulation technique. Initially ultrasound guidance will be used to visualize brachial plexus at the cricoid level with the intent to visualize upper trunks or roots. Then following established guidelines a nerve stimulating catheter will be placed. This will be done using an ARROW NERVE KIT. The kit is FAD approved for this purpose.. Following accepted aseptic guidelines the nerves will be visualized at the base of the neck using ultrasound machine. Once proper nerve roots or trunks visualized, kit provided 17gauge insulated Touhy needle will be used to access the brachial plexus. Once twitches elicited in Deltoid, biceps or triceps muscles at 0.5 mamp, catheter will be threaded via the needle while maintaining twitch at 0.5 mamp or less. Once catheter is threaded 3 cm beyond the tip, Touhy needle will be removed. Catheter will be tested for proper placement using lidocaine and epinephrine as is recommended by Regional Anesthesia Society guidelines. Thereafter 3 mg/kg of 0.5 % bupivacaine will be injected in small blouses via the catheter.\n\nIn the Experimental Group, after placement of monitors, the nerves will be visualized using ultrasound machine. Once nerve visualized at the cricoids level, proper tip of Touhy needle will be guided using hydro-dissection technique. Once in good place, catheter will be threaded 3 cm into the space. They subjects will be dosed using 0.5% bupivacaine 3 mg/kg for the surgery via the catheter. Adequacy of catheter placement will be judged by examining the spread of local anesthetics around the plexus.\n\nThe extent of block before the surgery will be evaluated at 30 minutes post injection. Surgery will be done with sedation. Conversion of anesthetic technique to general anesthesia will be considered failure of the technique to provide adequate surgical anesthesia.\n\nAt the end of the case the patient will be taken to recovery and will be evaluated for pain. If patient is having pain of 3 or more then they will be treated as follows.\n\nIn each catheter group patient will be dosed with 10 ml 1% lidocaine. If it fails to provide any relief then the catheter will be pulled back and another 10 ml1% lidocaine will be given. If still not effective then it will be replaced. Refusal of patient to replace the catheter will result in pt dropping out of the study.\n\nWorking catheter will be left in place for at least 48 hrs. Patients will be allowed to take oral pain medicines as prescribed by their surgeons. The patient will be sent home with pain pump to continuously give them 0.125% bupivacaine at 5 ml per hr with an option to get extra dose of 5 ml every one hr if needed. The pain control will be monitored while in-house and by phone daily till catheter comes out.'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'maximumAge': '90 Years', 'minimumAge': '18 Years', 'samplingMethod': 'PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'all subjects having total shoulder arthroplasty.', 'healthyVolunteers': False, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 yr or older\n* patient agreed to continuous regional block\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* minor\n* patient refusal\n* any neuropathy\n* allergies to local anesthetic,\n* inability to obtain informed consent for any reason, Opioid user, chronic pain patients or unanticipated procedure other than total shoulder arthroplasty'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT01122732', 'briefTitle': 'Comparison of Pain Relief After Non Stimulating Interscalene Catheter Placement vs Stimulating Catheter Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'University of Chicago'}, 'officialTitle': 'Comparison of Pain Relief After US Guided Non Stimulating Interscalene Catheter Placement vs Stimulating Catheter Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty;a Randomized Study', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': '10-242-B'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': 'US Group', 'description': 'Interscalene catheter will be placed with US guidance without any nerve stimulation guidance.'}, {'label': 'NS Group', 'description': 'Catheter will be placed using nerve stimulation guidance'}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'zip': '60637', 'city': 'Chicago', 'state': 'Illinois', 'country': 'United States', 'facility': 'University of Chicago Hospitals', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 41.85003, 'lon': -87.65005}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'TARIQ MALIK, MD', 'role': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'affiliation': 'University of Chicago'}]}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'University of Chicago', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'SPONSOR'}}}}