Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}, 'conditionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D000086382', 'term': 'COVID-19'}, {'id': 'D060825', 'term': 'Cognitive Dysfunction'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D011024', 'term': 'Pneumonia, Viral'}, {'id': 'D011014', 'term': 'Pneumonia'}, {'id': 'D012141', 'term': 'Respiratory Tract Infections'}, {'id': 'D007239', 'term': 'Infections'}, {'id': 'D014777', 'term': 'Virus Diseases'}, {'id': 'D018352', 'term': 'Coronavirus Infections'}, {'id': 'D003333', 'term': 'Coronaviridae Infections'}, {'id': 'D030341', 'term': 'Nidovirales Infections'}, {'id': 'D012327', 'term': 'RNA Virus Infections'}, {'id': 'D008171', 'term': 'Lung Diseases'}, {'id': 'D012140', 'term': 'Respiratory Tract Diseases'}, {'id': 'D003072', 'term': 'Cognition Disorders'}, {'id': 'D019965', 'term': 'Neurocognitive Disorders'}, {'id': 'D001523', 'term': 'Mental Disorders'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'phases': ['NA'], 'studyType': 'INTERVENTIONAL', 'designInfo': {'allocation': 'RANDOMIZED', 'maskingInfo': {'masking': 'DOUBLE', 'whoMasked': ['INVESTIGATOR', 'OUTCOMES_ASSESSOR']}, 'primaryPurpose': 'TREATMENT', 'interventionModel': 'PARALLEL'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 130}}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2022-03-15', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2024-07', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2024-07-02', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2024-07-08', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2021-12-21', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2021-12-21', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2024-07-09', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2021-12-22', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2024-01-26', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'otherOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Comparison of Work productivity and activity impairment between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': 'Scores at the WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) scale. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.'}, {'measure': 'Comparison of fatigue level between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': 'Score at the M-FIS scale (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale). The individual score will range from 0 \\[no fatigue\\] to 84 \\[extreme fatigue\\]'}, {'measure': 'Comparison of sleep quality between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': 'Score at the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory) scale. The individual score will range from 0 to 21. Higher score indicates lower sleep quality'}, {'measure': 'Comparison of psychological distress between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': 'Score at the OQ-45 (Outcome Questionnaire 45) scale. Scores range from 0 to 180, Higher scores indicate more severe psychological distress and functional impairment.'}], 'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Comparison of change in subjective cognitive difficulties between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': 'Two months post-intervention', 'description': 'Subjective report of difficulties experienced by patients in daily life: BRIEF (Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function) and MMQ (Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire) questionnaires.\n\nThe BRIEF summary index scales (Behavioral Regulation Index and Metacognition Index) and the scale reflecting overall functioning (Global Executive Composite) are expressed at t-scores (M=50, SD=10) ranging from 30 to 100. Higher scores indicates better outcome.\n\nThere are three scales in the MMQ : Satisfaction Scale, Ability Scale and Strategy Scale. The individual score will range from 0 to 72, from 0 to 80 and from 0 to 76 respectively for each scale. Higher scores indicate better ratings.'}], 'secondaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Comparison of change in subjective cognitive difficulties between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': 'Eight months post-intervention', 'description': 'Subjective report of difficulties experienced by patients in daily life: scores from BRIEF and MMQ questionnaires\n\nThe BRIEF summary index scales (Behavioral Regulation Index and Metacognition Index) and the scale reflecting overall functioning (Global Executive Composite) are expressed at t-scores (M=50, SD=10) ranging from 30 to 100. Higher scores indicates better outcome.\n\nThere are three scales in the MMQ : Satisfaction Scale, Ability Scale and Strategy Scale. The individual score will range from 0 to 72, from 0 to 80 and from 0 to 76 respectively for each scale. Higher scores indicate better ratings.'}, {'measure': 'Comparison of change in quality of life assessment between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': "Subjective report of quality of life experienced by patients in daily life: scores from ISQV (Inventaire Systématique de Qualité de Vie) and EQ-5D (from the EuroQol Group).\n\nScores at ISQV range from 1 (smallest possible gap between 'desired situation' and 'current situation' ) to 100 (largest possible gap). Scores at the EQ-5D range from 5 (full health) to 25 (worst health)."}, {'measure': 'Comparison of changes in cognitive performance between the two intervention arms', 'timeFrame': '2 and 8 months post-intervention', 'description': 'Cognitive scores in the domains of attention, working memory, long term memory and executive functions, as well as global cognitive efficiency.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': True, 'isFdaRegulatedDrug': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDevice': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'conditions': ['COVID-19', 'Cognitive Dysfunction']}, 'referencesModule': {'references': [{'pmid': '41277895', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Cabello Fernandez C, Didone V, Lesoinne A, Slama H, Fery P, Rousseau AF, Moutschen M; COVCOG group; Collette F, Willems S. Cognitive and affective psychoeducation for Long COVID: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Commun. 2025 Nov 11;7(6):fcaf447. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf447. eCollection 2025.'}, {'pmid': '40645608', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Cabello Fernandez C, Didone V, Slama H, Dupuis G, Fery P, Delrue G, Lesoinne A, Collette F, Willems S. Profiles of Individuals With Long COVID Reporting Persistent Cognitive Complaints. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Nov 24;40(8):1455-1472. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaf064.'}, {'pmid': '37596541', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Willems S, Didone V, Cabello Fernandez C, Delrue G, Slama H, Fery P, Goin J, Della Libera C; COVCOG Group; Collette F. COVCOG: Immediate and long-term cognitive improvement after cognitive versus emotion management psychoeducation programs - a randomized trial in covid patients with neuropsychological difficulties. BMC Neurol. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03346-9.'}]}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'The purpose of the study is to explore the potential effectiveness of two common low-dose interventions, one targeting cognitive difficulties and the other targeting affective difficulties on quality of life and cognition in people suffering from long-COVID with cognitive complaints.'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'maximumAge': '70 Years', 'minimumAge': '18 Years', 'healthyVolunteers': False, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects able to understand the information and consent forms;\n* Medically stable and at least 3 months after positive PCR for Covid-19;\n* Self-reported sufficiently good physical condition to attend the appointment;\n* No major hearing or vision disorders;\n* Cognitive complaints that place the person in the top 20% of dissatisfied functioning on the BRIEF or MMQ questionnaires;\n* Poor objective performance supported by a score below the 20th percentile on one task of the cognitive battery.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any chronic or remote neurological disorder (i.e. stroke, head trauma, epilepsy, tumor);\n* Cognitive impairment (minor or major neurocognitive disorder; intellectual disability) preexisting to the Covid-19 episode;\n* Acute brain injury or acute encephalopathy from another aetiology than covid (e.g., sepsis, liver or renal failure, alcohol or drug withdrawal, drug toxicity);\n* Documented preexisting history of psychiatric illness, including substance abuse; Open-heart cardiac surgery or cardiac arrest during the last 6 months;\n* Current hospitalization;\n* Current revalidation care with cognitive treatment'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT05167266', 'acronym': 'COV-COG', 'briefTitle': 'Long-Covid: Treatment of Cognitive Difficulties', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'University of Liege'}, 'officialTitle': 'Immediate and Long Term Cognitive Improvement After Cognitive Versus Emotion Management Psychoeducation Programs: a Randomised Trial in Covid Patients With Neuropsychological Difficulties', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': 'LCOV21-1303'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'type': 'EXPERIMENTAL', 'label': 'Cognitive psychoeducation', 'description': "1\\) The cognitive intervention is a 4-session, psycho-educative, integrative and multidimensional intervention designed to prevent post-acute cognitive symptoms. Each individual session will last 90' and will concern a specific cognitive domain:\n\n* Cognition in covid, fatigue and sleep\n* Working memory and attentional functioning\n* Executive functioning\n* Memory functioning\n\nThe structure of the sessions will be similar: (1) explanation about (dys)functioning of processes associated to the domain of interest: (2) identification of problems in daily life translated into functional objectives (e.g. keeping papers organized; scheduling activities to avoid fatigue); (3) discovery and application of (meta)cognitive strategies.\n\nMaterial (videos, tips,…) will be provided that the patients can consult when needed. The patients will have a diary to complete to explain when they applied the content of the intervention in daily life, and how successful it was.", 'interventionNames': ['Behavioral: Psychoeducation']}, {'type': 'ACTIVE_COMPARATOR', 'label': 'Affective psychoeducation', 'description': '2\\) The affective intervention is also a psychoeducation program based on four sessions, in which different strategies and resources will be proposed to increase self-efficacy for emotion management:\n\n* Recognizing emotions and affective states\n* Accepting and communicating emotions and difficulties\n* Accepting the uncertainty associated with difficulties\n* Behavioural activation\n\nMaterial (videos, tips,…) will be provided that the patients can consult when needed. The patients will have a diary to complete to explain when they applied the content of the intervention in daily life, and how successful it was.', 'interventionNames': ['Behavioral: Psychoeducation']}], 'interventions': [{'name': 'Psychoeducation', 'type': 'BEHAVIORAL', 'description': 'Psychoeducation refers to the process of providing education and information to those seeking or receiving mental health services.', 'armGroupLabels': ['Affective psychoeducation', 'Cognitive psychoeducation']}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'city': 'Brussels', 'country': 'Belgium', 'facility': 'ULB - CHU Erasme', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 50.85045, 'lon': 4.34878}}, {'zip': '4000', 'city': 'Liège', 'country': 'Belgium', 'facility': 'CHC Mont Légia', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 50.63373, 'lon': 5.56749}}, {'zip': '4000', 'city': 'Liège', 'country': 'Belgium', 'facility': 'CHR Citadelle', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 50.63373, 'lon': 5.56749}}, {'zip': '4000', 'city': 'Liège', 'country': 'Belgium', 'facility': 'ULiège - CHU', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 50.63373, 'lon': 5.56749}}, {'zip': '4000', 'city': 'Liège', 'country': 'Belgium', 'facility': 'ULiège - CPLU', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 50.63373, 'lon': 5.56749}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Sylvie Willems, PhD', 'role': 'STUDY_DIRECTOR', 'affiliation': 'ULiège'}, {'name': 'Fabienne Collette, PhD', 'role': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'affiliation': 'ULiège'}]}, 'ipdSharingStatementModule': {'infoTypes': ['STUDY_PROTOCOL', 'CSR'], 'ipdSharing': 'YES', 'description': 'Research data upon request after publication of the main results'}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'University of Liege', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'collaborators': [{'name': 'University Hospital, Antwerp', 'class': 'OTHER'}], 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'investigatorTitle': 'Research Director', 'investigatorFullName': 'Fabienne COLLETTE', 'investigatorAffiliation': 'University of Liege'}}}}