Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-04 @ 12:24 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03297866
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-05-22
First Post:
2017-09-26
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effectiveness of Different Incentive Models in Booster up the Second Follow up Response Rate
Sponsor:
Organization:
Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'CROSS_SECTIONAL', 'observationalModel': 'COHORT'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 1246}, 'patientRegistry': False}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2017-07-14', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2018-05', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2018-04-30', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2018-05-21', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2017-09-26', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2017-09-26', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2018-05-22', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2017-09-29', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2018-01-31', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Proportion of respondents who will complete the 3-month follow-up', 'timeFrame': 'Finish all telephone survey by Jan 2018', 'description': 'Proportion of respondents who will complete the 3-month follow-up'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDrug': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDevice': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'conditions': ['To Test the Effectiveness of Different Incentive Models for Increasing the Follow-up Response Rate in the Current Smoker Subject']}, 'referencesModule': {'references': [{'pmid': '31272393', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Cheung YTD, Weng X, Wang MP, Ho SY, Kwong ACS, Lai VWY, Lam TH. Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9.'}]}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'Aim to test the effectiveness of different incentive models for increasing the follow-up response rate in the current smoker subject.', 'detailedDescription': 'According to the Hong Kong Census and Statistic Department, 10.5% of the Hong Kong population who aged 15 years or above are daily smokers (Thematic Household Survey Report - Report No. 59, 2016). The smoking prevalence was estimated from a thematic household survey that has been conducted every 2 or 3 years. Another population-based survey related to tobacco control is the Tobacco Control Policy-related Survey conducted by the Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health and the University of Hong Kong. Both surveys were in a cross-sectional design and no follow-up was done. A cohort study with follow-up data could provide more insights for the causal relationship. However, most people are not willing to complete follow-up survey and the response rate is often low (Mellahi, 2016). The low survey response rate could lead to statistically bias in the research funding (Pit, 2014). Therefore, cohort surveys need to provide attractive monetary incentive to the interviewee to increase the response rate (Pit, 2014).\n\nThis study aims to assess and compare the 3-month response rate of a follow-up survey due to different financial incentive schemes. The findings will be used for a feasibility assessment of future cohort studies of evaluating tobacco control measures and public opinion, and exploration of appropriate incentive scheme.'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['CHILD', 'ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'minimumAge': '15 Years', 'samplingMethod': 'PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'All Hong Kong residents', 'healthyVolunteers': False, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged 15 or above\n* Cantonese or Mandarin speakers\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to provide a consent form\n* Speak language other than Cantonese and Mandarin'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT03297866', 'briefTitle': 'Effectiveness of Different Incentive Models in Booster up the Second Follow up Response Rate', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'The University of Hong Kong'}, 'officialTitle': 'Effectiveness of Different Incentive Models in Booster up the Second Follow up Response Rate', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': 'Incentive schemes 2017'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': 'Incentive schemes 1', 'description': 'No incentive will be given after completing the follow-up survey'}, {'label': 'Incentive schemes 2', 'description': 'Receiving $100 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey'}, {'label': 'Incentive schemes 3', 'description': 'Receiving $200 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey'}, {'label': 'Incentive schemes 4', 'description': 'Receiving $100 supermarket coupon before completing the follow-up survey and another $100 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey'}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'city': 'Hong Kong', 'country': 'Hong Kong', 'facility': 'Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 22.27832, 'lon': 114.17469}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Man Ping Wang, PhD', 'role': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'affiliation': 'Study Principal Investigator'}]}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'The University of Hong Kong', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'investigatorTitle': 'Assistant Professor', 'investigatorFullName': 'Dr. Wang Man-Ping', 'investigatorAffiliation': 'The University of Hong Kong'}}}}