Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:52 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-03 @ 12:16 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03375333
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-07-05
First Post:
2017-12-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice.
Sponsor:
Organization:
Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}}, 'documentSection': {'largeDocumentModule': {'largeDocs': [{'date': '2017-12-04', 'size': 1174999, 'label': 'Study Protocol', 'hasIcf': False, 'hasSap': False, 'filename': 'Prot_000.pdf', 'typeAbbrev': 'Prot', 'uploadDate': '2017-12-12T04:43', 'hasProtocol': True}, {'date': '2019-02-12', 'size': 1212310, 'label': 'Statistical Analysis Plan', 'hasIcf': False, 'hasSap': True, 'filename': 'SAP_002.pdf', 'typeAbbrev': 'SAP', 'uploadDate': '2019-02-13T15:07', 'hasProtocol': False}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'PROSPECTIVE', 'observationalModel': 'COHORT'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 579}, 'patientRegistry': False}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2018-01-15', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2019-07', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2019-07-01', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2019-07-02', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2017-12-12', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2017-12-15', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2019-07-05', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2017-12-18', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2019-07-01', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice:', 'timeFrame': '2018', 'description': "The GP's indication for using POC-US will be described through the frequencies of the GP's intention to rule-in/ rule-out or explore when using POC-US and through frequencies of the tentative diagnoses that entail the use of POC-US.\n\nPOC-US frequency is calculated as the number of consultations with POC-US (numerator) relative to all GP face-to-face consultations (denominator) during the study period. The frequency of each POC-US examination (numerator) will be compared to all types of POC-US scans (denominator).\n\nThe GPs will measure the time used for the POC-US examination. By the before and after registration of the organs intended to scan and the organ actually scanned, the extent of modification of POC-US to include e.g. opportunistic screening, can be estimated.\n\nThe findings in POC-US are measured through the categorical variables: Certain positive findings, uncertain positive findings, certain negative findings, uncertain negative findings, and incidental findings."}], 'secondaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'How POC-US influences the diagnostic process', 'timeFrame': '2018', 'description': 'The GPs are asked to declare the tentative diagnoses as one main tentative diagnosis and other possible diagnoses before the use of POC-US. After the use of POC-US the GPs will be shown their "Before-US" tentative diagnoses and asked if these diagnoses have changed. If the diagnoses have changed, they will be asked to specify this.\n\nThe tentative diagnoses are registered as ICPC-2 codes in the questionnaire. The GPs are asked to register any change in their confidence in the tentative diagnoses after the use of POC-US by choosing one of the following variables on an ordinal scale: Increased confidence, more confident, unchanged confidence, less confident, reduced confidence.\n\nTo test the reliability of the GPs\' declaration of confidence, we will examine if an increased confidence is correlated to specific organs scanned (Q2.2), a reduction in the total number of diagnoses (Q1.3, Q1.4, Q2.6 and Q2.7), or a change from symptom diagnosis to disease diagnosis.'}, {'measure': 'How POC-US affects the treatment of the patients:', 'timeFrame': '2018', 'description': 'The GPs register their plan for the patient by choosing one or more of the following categorical variables before using POC-US: Acute admission to hospital, subacute referral to hospital, normal referral to hospital, subacute referral to specialist, normal referral to specialist, referral for radiology, other referral e.g. to physiotherapist, follow-up in the clinic, no plan for follow-up, other.\n\nAfter using POC-US the GP is shown the "before POC-US plan for the patient" and asked if this plan has changed. If the plan has changed, the GP is asked to specify.\n\nThe GPs register their initiated treatment before POC-US by choosing one or more of the following categorical variables: Referral for treatment in the secondary sector, medication, other treatment, no treatment, other. After using POC-US the GP is shown the "before POC-US planned treatment for the patient" and asked if this planned treatment has changed. If the planned treatment has changed, the GP is asked to specify.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': True, 'isFdaRegulatedDrug': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDevice': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'keywords': ['ultrasound', 'diagnostics', 'general practice', 'family medicine'], 'conditions': ['Ultrasound', 'Diagnostics', 'General Practice']}, 'referencesModule': {'references': [{'pmid': '40207775', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Andersen CA, Brodersen JB, Mainz J, Thomsen JL, Graumann O, Lokkegaard T, Jensen MB. Does point-of-care ultrasound examination by the general practitioner lead to inappropriate care? A follow-up study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):613-625. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2487095. Epub 2025 Apr 10.'}, {'pmid': '32948563', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Aakjaer Andersen C, Brodersen J, Davidsen AS, Graumann O, Jensen MBB. Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037664.'}]}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'This study explores how Point of Care Ultrasound (POC-US) is used in general practice in Denmark and how it affects the diagnostic process and treatment of patients.\n\nTwenty general practitioners (GPs) will register information each time they use POC-US during a one month period. The information will include indications and frequencies of the performed POC-US examinations, change in tentative diagnosis, plan, and treatment before and after the use of POC-US in relation to confidence in the tentative diagnosis, findings and quality of the POC-US examination.\n\nThis is an observational study without any intervention.', 'detailedDescription': "This is a prospective, observational study aiming to describe: How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice, how POC-US influences the diagnostic process, and how POC-US affects the treatment of the patients.\n\nThe Use of POC-US will be explored through indication, frequency, time consumption, modification, and findings in order to describe:\n\n* Which organs the GPs scan, when using POC-US?\n* Which tentative diagnoses entail the use of POC-US?\n* If GPs intend to rule-in/rule-out or explore, when using POC-US?\n* How often the GPs use POC-US?\n* How often are the GPs able to produce POC-US pictures of relevant structures?\n* How much time POC-US adds to the consultation?\n* How often a difference in what the GP intends to scan and what POC-US is actually used for occurs (modification of the performed POC-US)?\n* How often POC-US leads to a specific finding?\n\nThe influences of the diagnostic process will be explored through change in the tentative diagnosis and change in the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis. The aim is to describe:\n\n* If POC-US changes the patient's tentative diagnosis\n* If POC-US increases the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis\n* The relationship between the GP's expression of confidence and change in the number of tentative diagnoses\n* The relationship between change from symptom diagnoses to disease diagnoses and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis\n* The relationship between specific organs scanned and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis\n\nThe effects on the treatment of patients will be explored through changes in the plan or treatment for the patient. The aim is to describe:\n\n* If POC-US changes the GP's plan for the patient\n* If POC-US changes the treatment for the patient\n* The relationship between findings and change in the plan or treatment for the patient.\n\nStudy setting:\n\nThe study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US.\n\nInterventions\n\nThere is no intervention in this study since the GPs are already using POC-US in their examination of patients.\n\nSample size\n\nThere are around 75 GPs in Denmark, who use POC-US. Of those 20 GPs will be included in this study.\n\nIt is estimated that the GPs will use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.\n\nRecruitment\n\nParticipating GPs:\n\nGPs using POC-US will be recruited through the continuous medical educations small-groups program, US networks, conferences, through teaching sessions, and through contacts via the Danish general practice research units. Interested GPs will be asked to register and answer a questionnaire including background information concerning demography,education and use of ultrasound. The participating GPs will be selected randomly among these registrations after considering in-and exclusion criteria.\n\nParticipating patients:\n\nEach time the participating GP use POC-US, he/she will ask the patient for informed consent. No restrictions are made regarding age or gender.\n\nBase-line assessment of GPs\n\nThe GPs' technical skills will be evaluated at baseline using a standardized protocol (OSAUS).\n\nData collection\n\nThe registration tool will be developed as a questionnaire to be used before and after the GP uses POC-US in the consultation. The questionnaire will include a time log to ensure the before and after registration. Several pilot tests will be performed both in the research group and with GPs using POC-US in order to ensure comprehension, feasibility and compliance.\n\nThe GPs will be asked to access a questionnaire in the online database SurveyXact each time they use their ultrasound device during their daily work. The GPs can access the questionnaire on their mobile phone, iPad or computer, using a unique link (respondent link) allocated each participating GP. A key file, connecting each participating GP with the respondent link in Surveyxact (link), will be safely stored at the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg.\n\nThe GPs will give each patient a unique ID-number A Key file connecting this ID-number and the patients CPR-number (Danish national social security number) will be safely stored at the GP's clinic.\n\nBefore questions:\n\n* GP ID number\n* Patient ID number\n* Date\n* Patient gender\n* Patient Age\n* What is the main reason to use POC-US in this patient? (Rule-in/Rule-out or Explore)\n* Which organs/positions is expected to be scanned? (organs on list)\n* What is the main tentative diagnosis for this patient? (ICPC2 codes)\n* Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses in this case? (ICPC2 codes)\n* What is the overall plan for this patient? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)\n* Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)\n\nAfter questions:\n\n* time used on the POC-US examination? (minutes)\n* Which organs/positions were scanned? (organs on list)\n* Was the GP able to produce ultrasound images of the relevant structures of (inserted text) ? (yes, no - please specify)\n* What did the GP find? (Certain positive findings, Uncertain positive findings, Certain negative findings, Uncertain negative findings, Incidental findings - please specify in free text)\n* Before POC-US the following tentative diagnoses were registered (inserted text) Has this changed? (yes but the ICPC2 code is unchanged, Yes both diagnosis and ICPC2 code have changed, no)\n* What is the tentative diagnosis for this patient now? (ICPC2 codes)\n* Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses for this patient (please specify)? (ICPC2 codes)\n* How is the GPs confidence in their main tentative diagnosis, after POC-US? (Highly increased confidence, More confident, unchanged confidence, Less confident, Highly reduced confidence)\n* Before POC-US the following plan was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has this plan changed? (yes, no)\n* What is the overall plan for this patient, now? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)\n* Before POC-US the following treatment was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has the treatment changed? (yes, no)\n* Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)\n\nPatient experience:\n\nAfter the consultation, patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. (This questionnaire will be described in detail in a separate protocol).\n\nFollow-up\n\nThe GPs will be asked to save patient information on the included patients (Key file) in order to identify the patient for an additional follow-up after six months (described in a separate protocol).\n\nStatistics\n\nDescriptive statistics will be used. A prospective statistical analysis plan will be uploaded to clinical trials before datacollection begins.\n\nResearch ethics approval\n\nThe study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice.\n\nSince the study is an observational study and does not include any intervention, approval by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics have been exempted.\n\nProtocol amendments\n\nWill be declared and all editions and changes of the protocol will be saved.\n\nFor further information a full protocol is uploaded to clinical trials."}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['CHILD', 'ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'samplingMethod': 'NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'The participating GP practices will be selected purposively aiming at a difference in organisation, geography, and equipment. GPs will be selected to vary in experience both regarding seniority as GPs and experience of using POC-US. Thus we will include partnerships and solo practices, urban and rural practices as well as practices with variable number of probes and type of ultrasound scanner.', 'healthyVolunteers': True, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria (general practitioners):\n\n1. Broad use of ultrasound\n2. Working week of minimum four days\n3. A minimum of 1400 patients listed\n4. A minimum of two scanning probes\n5. Previous participation in formal education in the use of ultrasound\n6. Minimum six months experience with ultrasound in general practice.\n7. Estimated use of ultrasound on a daily basis (average)\n\nExclusion Criteria (general practitioners):\n\n1. Ultrasound device more than 10 years old\n2. Conflict of interest, e.g. if the GP is part of the research group or if the GP has direct financial interest in selling US devices.\n3. If less than five patients have been enrolled.\n\nInclusion/Exclusion criteria (patients):\n\nAll patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT03375333', 'briefTitle': 'How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice.', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'Aalborg University'}, 'officialTitle': 'How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice. A Prospective Follow-up Study.', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': 'RUGPAalborg GULD projektet'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': '20GPs', 'description': '20 general practitioners, who use ultrasound in the examination of patients.'}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'city': 'Aalborg', 'country': 'Denmark', 'facility': 'Research unit for general practice in Aalborg,department of clinical medicine Aalborg university', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 57.048, 'lon': 9.9187}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Martin Bach Jensen, Professor, GP, PhD', 'role': 'STUDY_CHAIR', 'affiliation': 'Aalborg University'}]}, 'ipdSharingStatementModule': {'ipdSharing': 'UNDECIDED'}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'Aalborg University', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'investigatorTitle': 'MD', 'investigatorFullName': 'Camilla Aakjær Andersen', 'investigatorAffiliation': 'Aalborg University'}}}}