Raw JSON
{'hasResults': True, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}}, 'resultsSection': {'moreInfoModule': {'pointOfContact': {'email': 'clinicaltrials@allergan.com', 'phone': '714-246-4500', 'title': 'Therapeutic Area Head,', 'organization': 'Allergan, Inc'}, 'certainAgreement': {'otherDetails': 'A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.', 'restrictionType': 'OTHER', 'piSponsorEmployee': False, 'restrictiveAgreement': True}}, 'adverseEventsModule': {'timeFrame': 'Adverse events (AEs) were collected during the study period (Screening to Day 1).', 'eventGroups': [{'id': 'EG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.', 'otherNumAtRisk': 201, 'otherNumAffected': 0, 'seriousNumAtRisk': 201, 'seriousNumAffected': 0}], 'frequencyThreshold': '5'}, 'outcomeMeasuresModule': {'outcomeMeasures': [{'type': 'PRIMARY', 'title': 'Inter-rater Reliability Using a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale (MMPS)', 'denoms': [{'units': 'Participants', 'counts': [{'value': '201', 'groupId': 'OG000'}]}], 'groups': [{'id': 'OG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'classes': [{'title': 'Left Side', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.728', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.677', 'upperLimit': '0.786'}]}]}, {'title': 'Right Side', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.711', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.661', 'upperLimit': '0.767'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'NUMBER', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': "The MMPS is an ordinal tool to assess the masseter muscle prominence (jaw muscle) for each side of the face from 1=minimal to 5=very marked. Inter-rater (among raters) reliability was calculated separately for the left and right side of the face using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Kendall W statistics overall for the left and right sides of the face were derived using the average of assessment 1 and assessment 2 rounded to the nearest whole integer for each subject and each clinician. A total of 8 physicians rated each subject. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W is provided.", 'unitOfMeasure': "Kendall's W", 'dispersionType': '95% Confidence Interval', 'reportingStatus': 'POSTED', 'populationDescription': 'Reliability population: all subjects with at least assessment 1 performed by at least 1 in-person rater on day 1'}, {'type': 'PRIMARY', 'title': 'Intra-rater Reliability Using a MMPS', 'denoms': [{'units': 'Participants', 'counts': [{'value': '201', 'groupId': 'OG000'}]}], 'groups': [{'id': 'OG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'classes': [{'title': 'Left Side', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.634', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.607', 'upperLimit': '0.660'}]}]}, {'title': 'Right Side', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.638', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.611', 'upperLimit': '0.665'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'NUMBER', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The MMPS is an ordinal tool to assess the masseter muscle prominence (jaw muscle) for each side of the face from 1 = minimal to 5 = very marked. Intra-rater (within raters) reliability was calculated separately for the left and right side of the face using weighted Kappa statistics. Weighted Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 8 physician raters. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.', 'unitOfMeasure': 'Kappa statistics', 'dispersionType': '95% Confidence Interval', 'reportingStatus': 'POSTED', 'populationDescription': 'Reliability population: all subjects with at least assessment 1 performed by at least 1 in-person rater on day 1'}, {'type': 'PRIMARY', 'title': 'Inter-rater Reliability Using a Lower Facial Shape Classification (LFSC)', 'denoms': [{'units': 'Participants', 'counts': [{'value': '201', 'groupId': 'OG000'}]}], 'groups': [{'id': 'OG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'classes': [{'title': 'Assessment 1', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.358', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.343', 'upperLimit': '0.372'}]}]}, {'title': 'Assessment 2', 'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.352', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.337', 'upperLimit': '0.367'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'NUMBER', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The LFSC is a qualitative tool to assess facial shape into one of 5 categories (A, B, C, D, and E). Inter-rater (among raters) reliability was calculated using Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 5 facial categories. A total of 8 physicians rated each subject. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all categories combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each category using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.', 'unitOfMeasure': 'Kappa Statistics', 'dispersionType': '95% Confidence Interval', 'reportingStatus': 'POSTED', 'populationDescription': 'Reliability population: all subjects with at least assessment 1 performed by at least 1 in-person rater on day 1'}, {'type': 'PRIMARY', 'title': 'Intra-rater Reliability Using a LFSC', 'denoms': [{'units': 'Participants', 'counts': [{'value': '201', 'groupId': 'OG000'}]}], 'groups': [{'id': 'OG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'classes': [{'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '0.658', 'groupId': 'OG000', 'lowerLimit': '0.629', 'upperLimit': '0.686'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'NUMBER', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The LFSC is a qualitative tool to assess facial shape into one of 5 categories (A, B, C, D, and E). Intra-rater (within raters) reliability was calculated using Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 8 physician raters. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.', 'unitOfMeasure': 'Kappa statistics', 'dispersionType': '95% Confidence Interval', 'reportingStatus': 'POSTED', 'populationDescription': 'Reliability population: all subjects with at least assessment 1 performed by at least 1 in-person rater on day 1'}]}, 'participantFlowModule': {'groups': [{'id': 'FG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'periods': [{'title': 'Overall Study', 'milestones': [{'type': 'STARTED', 'achievements': [{'groupId': 'FG000', 'numSubjects': '201'}]}, {'type': 'COMPLETED', 'achievements': [{'groupId': 'FG000', 'numSubjects': '201'}]}, {'type': 'NOT COMPLETED', 'achievements': [{'groupId': 'FG000', 'numSubjects': '0'}]}]}]}, 'baselineCharacteristicsModule': {'denoms': [{'units': 'Participants', 'counts': [{'value': '201', 'groupId': 'BG000'}]}], 'groups': [{'id': 'BG000', 'title': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.'}], 'measures': [{'title': 'Age, Continuous', 'classes': [{'categories': [{'measurements': [{'value': '35.5', 'spread': '11.43', 'groupId': 'BG000'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'MEAN', 'unitOfMeasure': 'Years', 'dispersionType': 'STANDARD_DEVIATION'}, {'title': 'Sex: Female, Male', 'classes': [{'categories': [{'title': 'Female', 'measurements': [{'value': '128', 'groupId': 'BG000'}]}, {'title': 'Male', 'measurements': [{'value': '73', 'groupId': 'BG000'}]}]}], 'paramType': 'COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS', 'unitOfMeasure': 'Participants'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'PROSPECTIVE', 'observationalModel': 'COHORT'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 201}}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2013-03'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2014-03', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2013-05', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2014-03-28', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2013-03-25', 'resultsFirstSubmitDate': '2014-03-28', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2013-03-25', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2014-04-30', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'resultsFirstSubmitQcDate': '2014-03-28', 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2013-04-01', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'resultsFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2014-04-30', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2013-05', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Inter-rater Reliability Using a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale (MMPS)', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': "The MMPS is an ordinal tool to assess the masseter muscle prominence (jaw muscle) for each side of the face from 1=minimal to 5=very marked. Inter-rater (among raters) reliability was calculated separately for the left and right side of the face using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Kendall W statistics overall for the left and right sides of the face were derived using the average of assessment 1 and assessment 2 rounded to the nearest whole integer for each subject and each clinician. A total of 8 physicians rated each subject. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W is provided."}, {'measure': 'Intra-rater Reliability Using a MMPS', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The MMPS is an ordinal tool to assess the masseter muscle prominence (jaw muscle) for each side of the face from 1 = minimal to 5 = very marked. Intra-rater (within raters) reliability was calculated separately for the left and right side of the face using weighted Kappa statistics. Weighted Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 8 physician raters. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.'}, {'measure': 'Inter-rater Reliability Using a Lower Facial Shape Classification (LFSC)', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The LFSC is a qualitative tool to assess facial shape into one of 5 categories (A, B, C, D, and E). Inter-rater (among raters) reliability was calculated using Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 5 facial categories. A total of 8 physicians rated each subject. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all categories combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each category using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.'}, {'measure': 'Intra-rater Reliability Using a LFSC', 'timeFrame': 'Day 1', 'description': 'The LFSC is a qualitative tool to assess facial shape into one of 5 categories (A, B, C, D, and E). Intra-rater (within raters) reliability was calculated using Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of the 8 physician raters. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤0: poor, \\>0 to ≤0.2: slight, \\>0.2 to ≤0.4: fair, \\>0.4 to ≤0.6: moderate, \\>0.6 to ≤0.8: substantial, and \\>0.8 to ≤1.0: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'conditions': ['Healthy Volunteers']}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': "This study will evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale for evaluating a patient's muscle prominence and a Lower Shape Classification for evaluating a patient's lower facial shape."}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'minimumAge': '18 Years', 'samplingMethod': 'PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'Healthy Volunteers', 'healthyVolunteers': True, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n-sufficient visual acuity without the use of glasses or with contact lenses to self-assess lower facial shape in a mirror\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* infection of the mouth or gums, or facial skin infection requiring antibiotics\n* planned dental or facial procedure\n* unwillingness to be photographed and have the photos used for research, training, or educational purposes'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT01821534', 'briefTitle': 'Reliability of a Masseter Muscle Prominence Scale and Lower Facial Shape Classification', 'organization': {'class': 'INDUSTRY', 'fullName': 'Allergan'}, 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': '191622-128'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': 'All Participants', 'description': 'Healthy volunteers. No treatment (intervention) was administered.', 'interventionNames': ['Other: No Intervention']}], 'interventions': [{'name': 'No Intervention', 'type': 'OTHER', 'description': 'No treatment (intervention) was administered.', 'armGroupLabels': ['All Participants']}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'city': 'Newport Beach', 'state': 'California', 'country': 'United States', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 33.61891, 'lon': -117.92895}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Medical Director', 'role': 'STUDY_DIRECTOR', 'affiliation': 'Allergan'}]}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'Allergan', 'class': 'INDUSTRY'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'SPONSOR'}}}}