Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:31 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 8:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00756834
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2020-08-21
First Post:
2008-09-18
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Case Collection Study for Collecting Images for the Development and Validation of Computer Aided Detection Software
Sponsor:
Organization:
Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}, 'conditionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D001943', 'term': 'Breast Neoplasms'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D009371', 'term': 'Neoplasms by Site'}, {'id': 'D009369', 'term': 'Neoplasms'}, {'id': 'D001941', 'term': 'Breast Diseases'}, {'id': 'D012871', 'term': 'Skin Diseases'}, {'id': 'D017437', 'term': 'Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases'}]}, 'interventionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D008403', 'term': 'Mass Screening'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D019937', 'term': 'Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures'}, {'id': 'D003933', 'term': 'Diagnosis'}, {'id': 'D006306', 'term': 'Health Surveys'}, {'id': 'D011795', 'term': 'Surveys and Questionnaires'}, {'id': 'D003625', 'term': 'Data Collection'}, {'id': 'D004812', 'term': 'Epidemiologic Methods'}, {'id': 'D008919', 'term': 'Investigative Techniques'}, {'id': 'D003954', 'term': 'Diagnostic Services'}, {'id': 'D011314', 'term': 'Preventive Health Services'}, {'id': 'D006296', 'term': 'Health Services'}, {'id': 'D005159', 'term': 'Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services'}, {'id': 'D017531', 'term': 'Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms'}, {'id': 'D011787', 'term': 'Quality of Health Care'}, {'id': 'D017530', 'term': 'Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation'}, {'id': 'D011634', 'term': 'Public Health'}, {'id': 'D004778', 'term': 'Environment and Public Health'}, {'id': 'D015980', 'term': 'Public Health Practice'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'studyType': 'OBSERVATIONAL', 'designInfo': {'timePerspective': 'RETROSPECTIVE', 'observationalModel': 'COHORT'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 135}, 'patientRegistry': False}, 'statusModule': {'whyStopped': 'No longer pursuing FDA submission/approval.', 'overallStatus': 'TERMINATED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2006-11'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2020-08', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2020-08', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2020-08-19', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2008-09-18', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2008-09-19', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2020-08-21', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2008-09-22', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2020-08', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'The study will assess the performance of the MammoDetector™ Pro to correctly mark biopsy-proven breast cancers imaged on the Siemens Mammomat NovationDR FFDM system compared to conventional film-screen mammography (FSM).', 'timeFrame': '1 yr'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDrug': False, 'isFdaRegulatedDevice': True}, 'conditionsModule': {'keywords': ['Breast Cancer', 'Computer Aided Detection'], 'conditions': ['Breast Cancer']}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'The study objective is to assess the performance of the MammoDetector Pro to correctly mark biopsy-proven breast cancers imaged on the Siemens Mammomat Novation FFDM system compared to conventional film-screen mammography.', 'detailedDescription': 'The study design is a controlled study. The study is designed to demonstrate that the performance of the MammoDetector™ Pro on biopsy-proven malignant cases obtained with the Siemens Mammomat NovationDR FFDM system is not inferior to its performance on biopsy-proven malignant cases obtained with conventional film-screen mammography (FSM). The overall sensitivity of the MammoDetector™ Pro with both imaging modalities will be compared. Furthermore, the study is designed to demonstrate that the false marks noted by the MammoDetector™ Pro on routine screening "Normal" cases obtained with the FFDM system is not inferior those marked by the software on routine screening "Normal" cases obtained with conventional film-screen mammography (FSM).'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'FEMALE', 'stdAges': ['ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'minimumAge': '40 Years', 'samplingMethod': 'NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE', 'studyPopulation': 'Women 40 and older', 'healthyVolunteers': True, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Mammograms obtained from women 40 years of age and over;\n2. Mammograms obtained from women only;\n3. There are at least four standard views (right cranio-caudal \\[RCC\\], right medio-lateral oblique \\[RMLO\\], left cranio-caudal \\[LCC\\], left medio-lateral oblique \\[LMLO\\]) of the breast;\n4. Informed consent is obtained.\n\n Mammograms of biopsy-proven cancer cases will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet the following criteria:\n5. Biopsy-proven malignant case that was assigned a BI-RADS category 4 or 5 with a suspicious lesion and the corresponding pathology report for the suspicious lesion is available.\n6. Cases which have one or more lesion.\n\n Routine screening "Normal" cases will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet the following criteria:\n7. The case is a routine screening mammogram assigned a BI-RADS category 1 or 2 by a certified radiologist\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nCases are excluded from the study if they have any of the following conditions:\n\n1. Mammographic needle projection or pre-biopsy markings are evident on the mammogram (these may cause false marks).\n2. The mammograms include artifacts created by breast implant.\n3. The mammograms are of poor quality (e.g., the digital image has very poor contrast);\n\n Mammograms of biopsy-proven cancer cases will be excluded from the study if they have any of the following conditions:\n4. Cases in which the lesion is only palpable or visible by another modality (e.g., Ultrasound, MRI).\n5. The pathology is not related to a specific region. That is, there is more than one biopsy region and the pathology reports cannot be related to the appropriate mammographic lesion. For example, a mammogram with multiple lesions and multiple related pathology reports on the same date and it is not clear which pathology report belongs to each lesion.\n6. The pathology report is more than three months after the FFDM or FSM mammogram.\n7. The mammogram was performed for the purpose of planning cancer therapy (e.g., radiation) (BIRADS 6).\n8. Cases in which the lesion is characterized as an architectural distortion. -'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT00756834', 'briefTitle': 'Case Collection Study for Collecting Images for the Development and Validation of Computer Aided Detection Software', 'organization': {'class': 'INDUSTRY', 'fullName': 'Siemens Medical Solutions'}, 'officialTitle': 'A Multi-center, Controlled, Consecutive Collection of Screening or Diagnostic Full Field Digital Mammography Images Acquired on the Mammomat Novation DR System for Development and Validation of Computer Aided Detection (CAD) Software', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': 'SMS-SP04-04'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'label': 'Mammography Image Collection', 'description': 'Acquired images', 'interventionNames': ['Device: Screening']}, {'label': 'CAD Radiologist Reader', 'description': 'Retrospective reader study', 'interventionNames': ['Device: Screening']}], 'interventions': [{'name': 'Screening', 'type': 'DEVICE', 'description': 'The MammoDetector™ Pro is a computer-aided software intended to identify and mark regions of interest on standard mammographic views to bring them to the attention of the radiologist after the initial reading has been completed. Thus, the device assists the radiologist in minimizing observational oversights by identifying areas on the original mammogram that may warrant a second review', 'armGroupLabels': ['CAD Radiologist Reader', 'Mammography Image Collection']}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'zip': '19355', 'city': 'Malvern', 'state': 'Pennsylvania', 'country': 'United States', 'facility': 'Siemens Medical Solutions', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 40.03622, 'lon': -75.51381}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Louise Ebbert', 'role': 'STUDY_DIRECTOR', 'affiliation': 'Siemens Medical Solutions'}]}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'Siemens Medical Solutions', 'class': 'INDUSTRY'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'SPONSOR'}}}}