Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:20 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 3:14 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05077293
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-10-28
First Post:
2021-10-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Sponsor:
NYU Langone Health
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
BETTER CARE-HF Pilot Study: Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure, a Pilot Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
BETTER CARE-HF
Brief Summary:
This is a feasibility study using a cross-over design to implement and compare a best practice alert (BPA) with an automated in-basket message to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy. The data from this pilot study will lead to a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the BPA versus an automated in-basket message, versus usual care (no intervention).
Detailed Description:
An estimated 68,000 deaths per year nationwide can be attributed to gaps in care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with the majority being due to lack of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Despite proven benefits in randomized trials, class I guideline recommendations, and published clinical performance measures, patients with HFrEF are often not on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). While successful interventions for improvement in prescription of GDMT have often included multidisciplinary approaches with dedicated staff, the relatively high cost of hiring additional personnel has led to an interest in electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions. Prior studies on EHR-based interventions in this arena have mainly been conducted in the inpatient setting, which is limited to one encounter during acute hospitalization, a setting often complicated by renal dysfunction or hypotension that can limit prescription of MRA. The development and study of outpatient EHR-based alerts for HFrEF GDMT are needed. Two types of outpatient EHR-based interventions include best practice alerts (BPA) and automated in-basket messages. Both of these methods have limited data, with some studies showing benefit and others demonstrating provider fatigue and burnout. To our knowledge, there is no study that has directly compared these different types of EHR-based interventions.
This is a feasibility study using cross-over design at two outpatient clinics in a large health system to implement and compare a best practice alert (BPA) and an automated in-basket message to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy. The data from this study will lead to a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the BPA versus an automated in-basket message, versus usual care (no intervention).
This is a feasibility study using cross-over design at two outpatient clinics in a large health system to implement and compare a best practice alert (BPA) and an automated in-basket message to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy. The data from this study will lead to a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the BPA versus an automated in-basket message, versus usual care (no intervention).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: