Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:19 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05094193
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-10-26
First Post:
2021-10-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block
Sponsor:
Tunis University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Trocar-site Infiltration With Ropivacaine Versus Tranversus Abdominis Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-blinded, Randomized-controlled Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
For symptomatic gall bladder disorders (cholelithiasis and cholecystitis), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered as the gold standard treatment. However, these minimally invasive technique is associated with acute moderate pain during the 24 hours postoperative, which is routinely managed using opioids. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy. Besides, Wang et al found that TAP block is more effective than a conventional pain control, but not significatively different from another local incisional pain control that is port site infiltration.So, the aim of this study, is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of trocar-site infiltration with ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided TAP block following laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used as part of multimodal analgesia.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: