Viewing Study NCT00395993


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 1:06 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-25 @ 11:18 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT00395993
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2018-02-20
First Post: 2006-11-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
Sponsor: American Regent, Inc.
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron vs Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2018-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study compares of the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron vs oral iron in the treatment of anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding
Detailed Description: This is an open-label, randomized, Phase III, active-control, study of the efficacy and safety of IV iron vs oral iron in patients with anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: