Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:39 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:49 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03465267
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-03-14
First Post:
2018-03-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparisons of Two Types of Armeo Robot for Upper Extremities
Sponsor:
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing of Effects of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robot Therapy Using Armeo Power and Armeo Spring - Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-03
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparison of two types of robot (Armeo power vs Armeo spring) for upper extremity rehabilitation on upper extremity function
Detailed Description:
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of robot. The robot used in this experiment was Armeo power and Armeo spring. Armeo power could provide assistive force via motor, on the other hand, Armeo spring could not provide any assist.
Thus the results from this study might suggest usefulness of motorized robot.
Thus the results from this study might suggest usefulness of motorized robot.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: