Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:37 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 5:49 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06745167
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-20
First Post:
2024-11-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor:
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of extensive electro-anatomical guided pulsed field ablation (EXT-PFA) with traditional radiofrequency ablation (RF) in treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). The trial seeks to determine if EXT-PFA, which integrates anatomical and electrogram-guided strategies, can provide superior outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness compared to the standard RF ablation approach.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: