Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:37 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:46 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01133067
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-08-07
First Post:
2010-05-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Telephonic Contact and Subsequent Physical Follow up Treated Lung Cancer Patients
Sponsor:
Tata Memorial Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Prospective Study of Telephonic Contact and Subsequent Physical Follow up of Radically Treated Lung Cancer Patients
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
TELE001
Brief Summary:
Does the routine clinical practice of follow up after primary treatment in lung cancer patients has any utility.
Detailed Description:
Patients of cancer, after their primary treatment are subsequently called for follow up visits to assess the disease status. This has two important implications from the point of view of resource management. One, patients often have to travel long distances to report to the hospital and have to take care of other logistics such as their accommodation, local travel and food. Further often the patient travels with 1-2 attendants which adds to the logistic burden. Also, these patients of follow up also contribute to the load on existing hospital services. Many authors have speculated that follow-up visits generate anxiety about possible disease recurrence. On the other hand, many others have suggested that although there may be a transient increase in anxiety, patients are ultimately reassured by this practice. Hence, there is no firm evidence for the practice and the need for follow up in oncology care.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: