Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:36 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:46 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03764267
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-12-05
First Post:
2018-12-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
MAC vs TIVA Ambulatory Breast Augmentation
Sponsor:
Ain Shams University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Remifentanil and Ketofol Results in a Superior Quality of Recovery Compared With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Ambulatory Breast Augmentation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
hypothesis: the combination of LA with remifentanil and ketofol \[monitored anesthesia care (MAC)\] for ambulatory breast augmentation may result in results in better QoR on day of surgery as compared with total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) . The purpose of this study was to compare the QoR after MAC using remifentanil and ketofol with TIVA during ambulatory breast augmentation .
Detailed Description:
Breast augmentation surgery is commonly performed on an ambulatory basis under under general anesthesia (GA) with propofol and remifentanil or local anesthesia (LA). Although surgeons perform this operation comfortably under GA, Patients have anxiety and fear of complications due to GA. In addition, they expect a good postoperative quality of recovery (QOR) including ability to resume common activities (work and daily activities) without suffering from moderate to severe pain.
The LA is advantageous over GA in that airway instrumentation is not necessary, favorable recovery profile, decrease postoperative pain and vomiting, increase patient satisfaction and decrease the cost . However, patient anxiety or pain often leading to conversion of LA to GA, which suggests the concomitant use of i.v. sedatives and analgesics as a supplement to LA.
The combination of remifentanil and ketofol (propofol, ketamine) for sedation during regional anesthesia and LA has been shown to be a safe, effective technique, capable of maintains adequate analgesia with conscious sedation, haemodynamic stability, and achieves lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting with shorter recovery times.
The LA is advantageous over GA in that airway instrumentation is not necessary, favorable recovery profile, decrease postoperative pain and vomiting, increase patient satisfaction and decrease the cost . However, patient anxiety or pain often leading to conversion of LA to GA, which suggests the concomitant use of i.v. sedatives and analgesics as a supplement to LA.
The combination of remifentanil and ketofol (propofol, ketamine) for sedation during regional anesthesia and LA has been shown to be a safe, effective technique, capable of maintains adequate analgesia with conscious sedation, haemodynamic stability, and achieves lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting with shorter recovery times.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: