Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:36 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 1:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03071367
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-03-07
First Post:
2017-03-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical Learning for Airway Management in Medical Students
Sponsor:
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Title: A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical Learning for Airway Management in Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Multiple studies have shown clinical simulation benefits over classical learning method. Research on simulation of airway management has focused on endotracheal intubation training, while research on ventilation via facemask is scant. The investigators compared both learning methods regarding the acquirement of basic skills for airway management by medical students. Students in the clinical simulation group received a 3-hour training on airway management on the first day of their 28-day anesthesia rotation, while classical learning did not. On the last day of rotation, participants were evaluated based on a validated instrument of scores. Primary outcome was airway management scores. Secondary outcomes were rate of success of intubation and incidence of complications.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: