Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:58 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 12:53 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00301561
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-07-22
First Post:
2006-03-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Antiretroviral Treatment Simplified Follow-up Management Assessment (ANRS 12110 STRATALL)
Sponsor:
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Expanded Access to Antiretroviral Therapy in Africa: Assessment of the Patients' Management in District Hospitals With a Simplified Follow-up Approach (ANRS 12110 STRATALL)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is still limited in Africa (11% of patients in immediate need in June 2005). Face to the scope of the need and the constraints (unavailability and cost of viral load and CD4 cell count, lack of physicians…), WHO has developed a follow-up approach based on a simplified monitoring. However, this "simplified" approach which represents a major stake for the expanded access to ART has been little evaluated against the gold standard approach.
Detailed Description:
Justification
Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is still limited in Africa (11% of patients in immediate need in June 2005). Face to the scope of the need and the constraints (unavailability and cost of viral load and CD4 cell count, lack of physicians…), WHO has developed a follow-up approach based on a simplified monitoring. This "simplified" approach restricting the use of complementary exams including biologic criteria of effectiveness and tolerability, some people consider this approach as dangerous for the patient but also for the community (rapid emergence of resistances) and that it would be preferable to treat less patients and only with the gold standard approach. In practice, this "simplified" approach which represents a major stake for the expanded access to ART has been little evaluated against the gold standard approach.
Objectives
Main objective: To compare the increase in the CD4 cell count in patients receiving ART with a "simplified" approach and in those treated with the gold standard approach in district hospitals.
Secondary objectives: To compare between the two approaches the virologic effectiveness, survival, treatment interruptions, number of patients lost to follow-up, clinical progression, clinical and biologic tolerability, adherence, emergence of drug resistances, impact on patients' daily life, acceptability by the patients and health professionals, and cost-effectiveness performances.
Methods
Randomised, controlled, multicentre, non inferiority, intervention trial, without blind for approach, in 9 district hospitals of the Province du Centre in Cameroon. 430 adult patients will be randomised in two groups ("simplified" approach or gold standard approach) with a 1:1 ratio and followed for 24 months.
In the "simplified" approach, the results of the HIV-1 viral load and CD4 cell count will not be available for the management of patients, the biologic assessment of tolerability will be limited and some clinical consultations will be performed by nurses under the physicians' responsibility; the remainder will be similar to the gold standard approach.
Planning
The study will start in the first semester of 2006. The full length of the study would be 36 months maximum (12 months for enrolment and 24 months for follow-up).
Expected results
Advices for increasing access to ART in Africa.
Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is still limited in Africa (11% of patients in immediate need in June 2005). Face to the scope of the need and the constraints (unavailability and cost of viral load and CD4 cell count, lack of physicians…), WHO has developed a follow-up approach based on a simplified monitoring. This "simplified" approach restricting the use of complementary exams including biologic criteria of effectiveness and tolerability, some people consider this approach as dangerous for the patient but also for the community (rapid emergence of resistances) and that it would be preferable to treat less patients and only with the gold standard approach. In practice, this "simplified" approach which represents a major stake for the expanded access to ART has been little evaluated against the gold standard approach.
Objectives
Main objective: To compare the increase in the CD4 cell count in patients receiving ART with a "simplified" approach and in those treated with the gold standard approach in district hospitals.
Secondary objectives: To compare between the two approaches the virologic effectiveness, survival, treatment interruptions, number of patients lost to follow-up, clinical progression, clinical and biologic tolerability, adherence, emergence of drug resistances, impact on patients' daily life, acceptability by the patients and health professionals, and cost-effectiveness performances.
Methods
Randomised, controlled, multicentre, non inferiority, intervention trial, without blind for approach, in 9 district hospitals of the Province du Centre in Cameroon. 430 adult patients will be randomised in two groups ("simplified" approach or gold standard approach) with a 1:1 ratio and followed for 24 months.
In the "simplified" approach, the results of the HIV-1 viral load and CD4 cell count will not be available for the management of patients, the biologic assessment of tolerability will be limited and some clinical consultations will be performed by nurses under the physicians' responsibility; the remainder will be similar to the gold standard approach.
Planning
The study will start in the first semester of 2006. The full length of the study would be 36 months maximum (12 months for enrolment and 24 months for follow-up).
Expected results
Advices for increasing access to ART in Africa.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: