Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:33 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:41 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04554667
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-09-06
First Post:
2020-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Heavy Lifting Strength Training in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
Sponsor:
University of Alberta
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Feasibility and Safety of Heavy Lifting Strength Training in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Post-Surgical Neck Dissection
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LIFTING
Brief Summary:
The LIFTING trial will examine the feasibility and safety of a heavy lifting strength training (HLST) program in head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) at least 1 years post surgical neck dissection. The trial will determine whether this training style is safe and feasible in HNCS. Physical and psychosocial changes will also be reported.
Detailed Description:
RATIONALE Despite improvements in treatments, HNCS still endure numerous acute and chronic side effects. Strength training has been shown to manage some of these side effects but most interventions have involved light-to-moderate resistance training programs. HLST may produce better outcomes but it is unknown if such a weight training program is feasible and safe for HNCS.
OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this proposed study is to examine the feasibility and safety of a HLST program in HNCS at least 1 year post-surgical neck dissection.
METHODS This single arm feasibility study will recruit 15-20 HNCS to complete the HLST program 2 times per week. The primary feasibility outcomes will include the eligibility rate (with reasons for ineligibility), recruitment rate (with reasons for refusal), 1 repetition maximum testing rate (with reasons for not completing the test), program adherence (including attendance, dose modifications, and progression), and follow-up assessment rate (with reasons for drop out). The primary efficacy outcome will be strength gains from baseline. Secondary efficacy outcomes will include physical functioning, quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, pain, body composition, anxiety, fatigue, stress, shoulder mobility, self-esteem, sleep, and motivation to engage in a HLST program.
SIGNIFICANCE Weight training is an effective intervention in HNCS but the optimal weight training prescription is unknown. If heavy weight training is deemed safe and feasible in HNCS, it can be compared to light-to-moderate load weight training to determine if it is a better prescription for improving outcomes that are important to HNCS.
OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this proposed study is to examine the feasibility and safety of a HLST program in HNCS at least 1 year post-surgical neck dissection.
METHODS This single arm feasibility study will recruit 15-20 HNCS to complete the HLST program 2 times per week. The primary feasibility outcomes will include the eligibility rate (with reasons for ineligibility), recruitment rate (with reasons for refusal), 1 repetition maximum testing rate (with reasons for not completing the test), program adherence (including attendance, dose modifications, and progression), and follow-up assessment rate (with reasons for drop out). The primary efficacy outcome will be strength gains from baseline. Secondary efficacy outcomes will include physical functioning, quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, pain, body composition, anxiety, fatigue, stress, shoulder mobility, self-esteem, sleep, and motivation to engage in a HLST program.
SIGNIFICANCE Weight training is an effective intervention in HNCS but the optimal weight training prescription is unknown. If heavy weight training is deemed safe and feasible in HNCS, it can be compared to light-to-moderate load weight training to determine if it is a better prescription for improving outcomes that are important to HNCS.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: