Viewing Study NCT00207467


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 12:27 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-25 @ 10:33 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT00207467
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2005-09-21
First Post: 2005-09-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Study to Improve Partner Services for STD Prevention
Sponsor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Prospective Study for Cost-Effectiveness Strategies to Improve Partner Notification: Female Trichomonas and Male Urethritis Studies
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2005-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of patient-delivered partner treatment (PDPT) compared to standard partner referral (PR) and booklet enhanced partner referral (BEPR).
Detailed Description: For partner treatment, index women who were diagnosed with trichomonas vaginalis and index men who were diagnosed with urethritis were randomized to one of three study arms:

Standard partner referral (PR) - index patients were instructed to tell their partners that they need to go to a clinic for STI evaluation and treatment.

Booklet-enhanced partner referral (BEPR) - index patients were given a wallet-sized booklet containing 4 tear-out cards with information for the partner and treatment guidelines for the providers that would see the partners. The partners could then present this card at a clinic to help the clinician better treat them. If index patients had more than 4 partners, they were given additional booklets.

Patient delivered partner treatment (PDPT) - index patients were given packages containing 2 gram metronidazole (for TV patients) or azithromycin 1 gram and cefixime 400 mg (for urethritis patients) for up to 4 identified sex partners. When cefixime was no longer available, ciprofloxacin 500 mg was used. These packages contained written instructions about how to take the medication, warnings about side effects and a nurse's pager number to call if there were any questions or if the partner encountered any problems. All medications were distributed in containers with childproof caps and the partner's initial and birthdates were written on the bottle. This was a requirement of the Louisiana State Pharmacy Board. Names were not documented on the index patient's study or medical records.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
CA# R30/CCR619143-01 None None View