Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:27 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06815367
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-15
First Post:
2024-09-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery
Sponsor:
University of Southern California
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing the Effects of Pneumatic Compression and Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Muscle Recovery
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Both BFR and intermittent pneumatic compression are purported to decrease symptoms associated with exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) that cause delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Blood flow restriction relies on applying pressurized cuffs to the most proximal portion of the limb. Another form of recovery often relied upon is pneumatic compression. The mechanism by which pneumatic compression works is similar to that of a massage, whereby the device progressively increases the pressure on a portion of the limb before releasing and moving further up the limb.The purpose of this study is determine whether BFR or pneumatic compression can be used to decreased DOMS which may indicate enhanced recovery.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: