Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:26 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:32 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04683458
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-01-15
First Post:
2020-12-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Analysis of Linked Health Insurance Claims and Clinical Registries to Determine Device Surveillance With Paclitaxel-coated Medical Devices
Sponsor:
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
GermanVasc/MDEpiNet Paclitaxel Study
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-01
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PacliVasc
Brief Summary:
The GermanVasc/MDEpiNet Paclitaxel Study, aims to use routinely collected data from health insurance claims and registries. The longitudinal data of Germany's second-largest insurance fund, BARMER, includes the outpatient and inpatient medical care provided to ≈9.4 million German citizens (13.2% of Germany's population) involving \>21 million hospitalizations between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. The BARMER cohort is similar to Western European countries and has been widely used for research projects. A regular random sample validation of internal and external validity is performed by the Medical Service of the Health Funds in Germany, and various peer-reviewed validation studies have been previously published. The GermanVasc clinical registry was implemented in 2018 as EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant registry platform to process routinely collected clinical data from more than 35 high-volume vascular centers in Germany. In an ongoing project of a large multispecialty and multidisciplinary research consortium (RABATT study, Principal Investigator: PD Dr. Christian-Alexander Behrendt), active surveillance and medical device evaluation methods were developed. The current study aims to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in peripheral arteries. It further aims to illuminate the underlying differences between the cohorts in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world data that can possibly explain the diametrically opposed results in an ongoing international controversy.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: