Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:14 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07224958
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-08
First Post:
2025-10-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
ROAM OA: Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes Wearing a Knee Brace for Unicompartmental OA
Sponsor:
Rush University Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
ROAM OA: Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes Wearing a Knee Brace for Unicompartmental OA
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace and the Ossur Unloader One Knee Brace in subjects with medial compartment osteoarthritis. The focus is on comparing the immediate and short-term biomechanical effects of these braces on knee adduction moments and spatiotemporal gait parameters, as well as assessing the long-term efficacy of the ROAM OA brace in improving pain and functional outcomes for individuals with osteoarthritis.
Detailed Description:
INTRODUCTION The Enovis ROAM OA outcomes study is a prospective, single-center, crossover study with a subsequent randomized control phase and extended follow-up gait analysis, intended to evaluate the efficacy of the ROAM OA knee brace in subjects with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA).
The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace and the Ossur Unloader One Knee Brace in subjects with medial compartment OA. The focus is on comparing the immediate and short-term biomechanical effects of these braces on knee adduction moments and spatiotemporal gait parameters, as well as assessing the long-term efficacy of the ROAM OA brace in improving pain and functional outcomes for individuals with OA.
1.1 Background Osteoarthritis of the knee significantly impacts the quality of life and functional capacity of those affected. Globally, hundreds of millions of people live with OA, with the knee being the most frequently affected joint. This condition leads to symptoms such as pain, swelling, and stiffness, which impair mobility and daily activities, affecting overall well-being and social connectedness.
The prevalence of knee OA is influenced by factors such as aging and obesity, and with an aging population, the incidence of knee OA is expected to rise. This increase underscores the need for effective management strategies.
Non-invasive interventions such as knee orthoses have been highlighted in OA management. These devices, including the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace, are designed to unload the affected compartment of the knee to reduce pain and improve function. Despite their potential benefits, the efficacy and biomechanical impacts of these braces require further investigation to optimize their clinical use.
Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with knee OA helps quantify disease burden and treatment effectiveness. Instruments such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) are commonly used to evaluate impairment and pain, respectively.
As the prevalence of knee OA continues to increase, there is a clear need for ongoing research into effective management strategies, including orthotic interventions. Understanding the impact of these approaches on quality of life and functional outcomes is essential to guide clinical decision-making.
1.2 Rationale Although several studies have examined knee braces in OA, there remains limited understanding of their specific biomechanical effects and correlation with patient-reported outcomes. The influence of braces on knee adduction moments-a key factor in medial compartment loading and pain-remains insufficiently characterized.
This study is designed to address that gap by integrating objective gait analysis with patient-reported outcomes. Assessing changes in knee adduction moments and other gait parameters will provide insight into the mechanical effectiveness of the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace. Evaluating patient-reported outcomes such as pain, comfort, and function will clarify how mechanical improvements correspond to perceived clinical benefit.
1.3 Device Description The ROAM OA knee brace, manufactured by Enovis, is intended for individuals with symptoms, physical findings, or radiographic evidence of moderate to severe unicompartmental knee OA, postoperative meniscal repair where unicompartmental unloading is indicated, or varus-valgus conditions that may benefit from compartmental unloading.
It is a single-patient-use device that alleviates pain due to single-compartment OA by applying controlled forces to the leg to shift load from the affected knee compartment to the healthier one.
1.4 Clinical Data to Date This is the first clinical study to collect prospective data on the ROAM OA knee brace.
STUDY DESIGN 2.1 Number of Study Sites Subjects will be recruited from Midwest Orthopedics at Rush and all affiliated clinical locations. All study activities will be conducted in the Rush Department of Orthopedic Surgery Motion Analysis Laboratory.
2.2 Number of Subjects Thirty subjects will be enrolled.
2.3 Estimated Study Duration Enrollment is expected at a rate of approximately two subjects per month, with clinical follow-up at four and eight weeks. The total study duration is estimated at 18 months.
STUDY OBJECTIVES 3.1 Primary Objective Biomechanical Comparison: To compare the immediate and short-term biomechanical effects of the ROAM OA brace and the Ossur Unloader One brace, focusing on knee adduction moments and spatiotemporal gait parameters.
Long-term Efficacy: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the ROAM OA brace in improving pain and functional outcomes among individuals with knee OA.
3.2 Secondary Objectives Evaluate safety and comfort of the ROAM OA brace, including any adverse effects and user experience.
Assess changes in gait parameters over time to determine the brace's role in promoting functional mobility and reducing medial knee load.
STUDY ENDPOINTS 4.1 Primary Endpoints Changes in Knee Adduction Moment: Measured at baseline (no brace), immediately after fitting each brace, and at four- and eight-week follow-ups using markerless gait analysis.
VAS Pain Changes: Pain levels assessed via VAS at each study milestone, including baseline, post-fitting, and follow-ups.
4.2 Secondary Endpoints Brace comfort and user compliance
Pain medication usage
KOOS score changes
Device-related and serious adverse event rate
Changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters (step length, walking speed, cadence)
STUDY POPULATION 5.1 Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria
Adults aged 40-85 years
BMI \<35
Diagnosed with medial compartment knee OA
Walking pain ≥4 on the VAS
Willingness to wear the assigned brace daily and complete study follow-up
Ability to walk independently for at least 20 minutes
Stable use of over-the-counter pain medications
No intra-articular injections within three months of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
Lateral or patellofemoral OA
Previous knee joint replacement
Ligamentous instability or acute lower extremity injury
Neurological disorders affecting gait
Dermatologic or allergic conditions preventing brace use
Current use of opioids or corticosteroids
Inability to understand study instructions
Pregnancy
STUDY PROCEDURES
All participants will provide electronic informed consent through a secure platform prior to participation.
Subjects will undergo baseline data collection, brace fitting, crossover gait analysis, and randomized assignment to either brace or standard-of-care control groups. Follow-up assessments will occur at four and eight weeks, including ROM evaluation, PROMs, gait analysis, and safety review.
All data will be documented on case report forms and securely stored in accordance with institutional requirements.
Subjects will incur no cost for participation. Both braces will be provided for study purposes.
RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT 7.1 Risk Category Low risk.
7.2 Potential Risks Minor risk of falls during walking tests
Temporary muscle soreness
Skin irritation from the brace
Finger strain from adjusting buckles
Emotional discomfort from questionnaires
7.3 Protection Against Risks Participants will be monitored closely, and any protocol deviations required for safety will be reported to the IRB.
7.4 Potential Benefits Participants may experience improved comfort, pain relief, or mobility due to brace use. Data collected may contribute to improved clinical management of knee OA in the future.
STATISTICAL PLAN
P-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
8.1 Primary Analysis Changes in knee adduction moments, gait parameters, and VAS pain scores across defined timepoints will be analyzed using appropriate statistical models for repeated measures.
8.2 Secondary Analysis Secondary endpoints, including KOOS changes, brace comfort, and adverse event rates, will be analyzed descriptively and inferentially as applicable.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace and the Ossur Unloader One Knee Brace in subjects with medial compartment OA. The focus is on comparing the immediate and short-term biomechanical effects of these braces on knee adduction moments and spatiotemporal gait parameters, as well as assessing the long-term efficacy of the ROAM OA brace in improving pain and functional outcomes for individuals with OA.
1.1 Background Osteoarthritis of the knee significantly impacts the quality of life and functional capacity of those affected. Globally, hundreds of millions of people live with OA, with the knee being the most frequently affected joint. This condition leads to symptoms such as pain, swelling, and stiffness, which impair mobility and daily activities, affecting overall well-being and social connectedness.
The prevalence of knee OA is influenced by factors such as aging and obesity, and with an aging population, the incidence of knee OA is expected to rise. This increase underscores the need for effective management strategies.
Non-invasive interventions such as knee orthoses have been highlighted in OA management. These devices, including the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace, are designed to unload the affected compartment of the knee to reduce pain and improve function. Despite their potential benefits, the efficacy and biomechanical impacts of these braces require further investigation to optimize their clinical use.
Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with knee OA helps quantify disease burden and treatment effectiveness. Instruments such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) are commonly used to evaluate impairment and pain, respectively.
As the prevalence of knee OA continues to increase, there is a clear need for ongoing research into effective management strategies, including orthotic interventions. Understanding the impact of these approaches on quality of life and functional outcomes is essential to guide clinical decision-making.
1.2 Rationale Although several studies have examined knee braces in OA, there remains limited understanding of their specific biomechanical effects and correlation with patient-reported outcomes. The influence of braces on knee adduction moments-a key factor in medial compartment loading and pain-remains insufficiently characterized.
This study is designed to address that gap by integrating objective gait analysis with patient-reported outcomes. Assessing changes in knee adduction moments and other gait parameters will provide insight into the mechanical effectiveness of the ROAM OA Single Upright Brace. Evaluating patient-reported outcomes such as pain, comfort, and function will clarify how mechanical improvements correspond to perceived clinical benefit.
1.3 Device Description The ROAM OA knee brace, manufactured by Enovis, is intended for individuals with symptoms, physical findings, or radiographic evidence of moderate to severe unicompartmental knee OA, postoperative meniscal repair where unicompartmental unloading is indicated, or varus-valgus conditions that may benefit from compartmental unloading.
It is a single-patient-use device that alleviates pain due to single-compartment OA by applying controlled forces to the leg to shift load from the affected knee compartment to the healthier one.
1.4 Clinical Data to Date This is the first clinical study to collect prospective data on the ROAM OA knee brace.
STUDY DESIGN 2.1 Number of Study Sites Subjects will be recruited from Midwest Orthopedics at Rush and all affiliated clinical locations. All study activities will be conducted in the Rush Department of Orthopedic Surgery Motion Analysis Laboratory.
2.2 Number of Subjects Thirty subjects will be enrolled.
2.3 Estimated Study Duration Enrollment is expected at a rate of approximately two subjects per month, with clinical follow-up at four and eight weeks. The total study duration is estimated at 18 months.
STUDY OBJECTIVES 3.1 Primary Objective Biomechanical Comparison: To compare the immediate and short-term biomechanical effects of the ROAM OA brace and the Ossur Unloader One brace, focusing on knee adduction moments and spatiotemporal gait parameters.
Long-term Efficacy: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the ROAM OA brace in improving pain and functional outcomes among individuals with knee OA.
3.2 Secondary Objectives Evaluate safety and comfort of the ROAM OA brace, including any adverse effects and user experience.
Assess changes in gait parameters over time to determine the brace's role in promoting functional mobility and reducing medial knee load.
STUDY ENDPOINTS 4.1 Primary Endpoints Changes in Knee Adduction Moment: Measured at baseline (no brace), immediately after fitting each brace, and at four- and eight-week follow-ups using markerless gait analysis.
VAS Pain Changes: Pain levels assessed via VAS at each study milestone, including baseline, post-fitting, and follow-ups.
4.2 Secondary Endpoints Brace comfort and user compliance
Pain medication usage
KOOS score changes
Device-related and serious adverse event rate
Changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters (step length, walking speed, cadence)
STUDY POPULATION 5.1 Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria
Adults aged 40-85 years
BMI \<35
Diagnosed with medial compartment knee OA
Walking pain ≥4 on the VAS
Willingness to wear the assigned brace daily and complete study follow-up
Ability to walk independently for at least 20 minutes
Stable use of over-the-counter pain medications
No intra-articular injections within three months of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
Lateral or patellofemoral OA
Previous knee joint replacement
Ligamentous instability or acute lower extremity injury
Neurological disorders affecting gait
Dermatologic or allergic conditions preventing brace use
Current use of opioids or corticosteroids
Inability to understand study instructions
Pregnancy
STUDY PROCEDURES
All participants will provide electronic informed consent through a secure platform prior to participation.
Subjects will undergo baseline data collection, brace fitting, crossover gait analysis, and randomized assignment to either brace or standard-of-care control groups. Follow-up assessments will occur at four and eight weeks, including ROM evaluation, PROMs, gait analysis, and safety review.
All data will be documented on case report forms and securely stored in accordance with institutional requirements.
Subjects will incur no cost for participation. Both braces will be provided for study purposes.
RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT 7.1 Risk Category Low risk.
7.2 Potential Risks Minor risk of falls during walking tests
Temporary muscle soreness
Skin irritation from the brace
Finger strain from adjusting buckles
Emotional discomfort from questionnaires
7.3 Protection Against Risks Participants will be monitored closely, and any protocol deviations required for safety will be reported to the IRB.
7.4 Potential Benefits Participants may experience improved comfort, pain relief, or mobility due to brace use. Data collected may contribute to improved clinical management of knee OA in the future.
STATISTICAL PLAN
P-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
8.1 Primary Analysis Changes in knee adduction moments, gait parameters, and VAS pain scores across defined timepoints will be analyzed using appropriate statistical models for repeated measures.
8.2 Secondary Analysis Secondary endpoints, including KOOS changes, brace comfort, and adverse event rates, will be analyzed descriptively and inferentially as applicable.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: