Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:12 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:13 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00303758
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2014-03-04
First Post:
2006-03-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
Sponsor:
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Essai Randomise Comparant Deux Stategies De Chimiotherapie Dans Les Cancers Pancreatiques Avances: LV5FU2 Simplifie + Cisplatine Suivi de Gemcitabine, Versus Gemcitabine Suivi de LV5FU2 Simplifie + Cisplatine en Can de Progression
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2006-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fluorouracil, leucovorin, cisplatin, and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) and giving them in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating metastatic pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different combination chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different combination chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Detailed Description:
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
* Compare the overall survival of patients with unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine hydrochloride vs gemcitabine hydrochloride followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin.
Secondary
* Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the percentage of these patients needing second-line therapy.
* Compare the duration of hospitalization of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), participating center, location of the tumor (ampullar region vs other locations), and infusion rate of gemcitabine hydrochloride (30 vs 100 minutes). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1, cisplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1 or 2, and fluorouracil IV over 46 hours on day 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 or 100 minutes weekly for 7 weeks. Patients then receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 or 100 minutes weekly for 7 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression receive fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin as in arm I.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 2 months.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 202 patients will be accrued for this study.
Primary
* Compare the overall survival of patients with unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine hydrochloride vs gemcitabine hydrochloride followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin.
Secondary
* Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the percentage of these patients needing second-line therapy.
* Compare the duration of hospitalization of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), participating center, location of the tumor (ampullar region vs other locations), and infusion rate of gemcitabine hydrochloride (30 vs 100 minutes). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1, cisplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1 or 2, and fluorouracil IV over 46 hours on day 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 or 100 minutes weekly for 7 weeks. Patients then receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 or 100 minutes weekly for 7 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression receive fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and cisplatin as in arm I.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 2 months.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 202 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: