Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:11 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:11 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07197658
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-29
First Post:
2025-08-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Healing After Endodontic Microsurgery Using a Rotary Bur Versus Piezoelectric Unit for Osteotomy and Root Resection
Sponsor:
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prospective Healing Assessment After Application of Endodontic Microsurgery for Elimination of Apical Pathology By Use of Either a Rotary Bur for Osteotomy and Apical Root Resection, or Piezoelectric Unit for the Same Clinical Procedures
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
BURVSPIEZO
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare bone healing after using apical tooth microsurgery to remove root end infection, either by use of rotary burs for cutting bone and root end, or by use of piezoelectric surgery for the same procedures.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is there a difference in bone healing and reformation between the two surgical procedures ?
* Is there a difference in bone healing between cutting the bone with a rotary bur and cutting the bone with the 'bone window' technique that uses piezoelectric unit ?
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is there a difference in bone healing and reformation between the two surgical procedures ?
* Is there a difference in bone healing between cutting the bone with a rotary bur and cutting the bone with the 'bone window' technique that uses piezoelectric unit ?
Detailed Description:
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare postsurgical healing after the use of microsurgical technique to eliminate apical pathology, either by use of rotary burs for osteotomy and root resection, or by use of piezoelectric surgery for the same clinical procedures. Null hypothesis is that there is no difference in healing and buccal bone thickness reformation between the two surgical procedures Another purpose of the study is to prospectively evaluate healing after the application of a novel buccal bone preservation technique, called the 'bone window' technique. The technique will be applied in a subgroup of patients on maxillary and mandibular premolar and molar teeth with an intact buccal cortical bone and healing and buccal bone reformation will be assessed at follow up. Null hypothesis in this part, is that there is no difference in healing and buccal bone preservation between osteotomy with a bur and the 'bone window' technique.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: