Viewing Study NCT06240858


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 12:03 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-25 @ 10:01 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06240858
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-02-06
First Post: 2024-01-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
Sponsor: Second Hospital of Jilin University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective.

Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes.

Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: