Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:01 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:59 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05701358
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-06-19
First Post:
2023-01-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Physiology-guided vs Angiography-guided Non-culprit Lesion Complete Revascularization for Acute MI & Multivessel Disease
Sponsor:
Population Health Research Institute
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial of Physiology-guided vs Angiography-guided Non-culprit Lesion Complete Revascularization Strategies & an Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute MI & Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
COMPLETE-2
Brief Summary:
COMPLETE-2 is a prospective, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a strategy of physiology-guided complete revascularization to angiography-guided complete revascularization in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who have undergone successful culprit lesion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).
COMPLETE-2 OCT is a large scale, prospective, multi-centre, observational, imaging study of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI and multivessel CAD in a subset of eligible COMPLETE-2 patients.
COMPLETE-2 OCT is a large scale, prospective, multi-centre, observational, imaging study of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI and multivessel CAD in a subset of eligible COMPLETE-2 patients.
Detailed Description:
COMPLETE-2 STUDY OBJECTIVES
1. To determine whether a strategy of physiology-guided complete revascularization is non-inferior to a strategy of angiography-guided complete revascularization on the efficacy composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, new myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemia-driven revascularization (IDR).
2. To determine whether a physiology-guided complete revascularization strategy is superior to an angiography-guided complete revascularization strategy in reducing the safety composite outcome of clinically significant bleeding, stroke, stent thrombosis or contrast-associated acute kidney injury.
1. To determine whether a strategy of physiology-guided complete revascularization is non-inferior to a strategy of angiography-guided complete revascularization on the efficacy composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, new myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemia-driven revascularization (IDR).
2. To determine whether a physiology-guided complete revascularization strategy is superior to an angiography-guided complete revascularization strategy in reducing the safety composite outcome of clinically significant bleeding, stroke, stent thrombosis or contrast-associated acute kidney injury.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: