Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:53 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00816751
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-08-13
First Post:
2008-12-31
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine
Sponsor:
University of California, San Diego
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine for Suction Curettage: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of intracervical versus paracervical block on pain experienced during first trimester suction curettage without the use of preoperative cervical ripening. Because of the theoretical improved reliability of stromal block, the investigators hypothesize that intracervical block would produce lower pain scores than paracervical block at the time of cervical dilation.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: