Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:53 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07151651
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-03
First Post:
2025-08-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Comparison Between Biportal and Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Sponsor:
Sohag University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparative Study Between Uniportal and Biportal Endocopic Techniques on Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to provide a detailed comparison between different methods of lumbar discectomy by the use of different types of spine endoscopy to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each type
Detailed Description:
The aim of this study is to compare between uniportal and biportal endoscopic techniques in patients with lumbar disc herniation in terms of efficacy, safety, and learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery .The research will focus on clinical outcomes, functional recovery, complication rates, patient satisfaction and surgical proficiency in different endoscopic spine surgery techniques, including uniportal and biportal approaches assessing their relative advantages and limitations.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
True
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: