Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:42 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06629051
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-10-08
First Post:
2024-10-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
6-year Follow-up Data After the Berberine Intervention Trial
Sponsor:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study of Berberine Hydrochloride in Preventing Recurrence and Carcinogenesis After Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Adenomas：6-year Retrospective Follow-up Data
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy of the digestive tract, which constitutes a major public health burden. Almost 90% of CRC cases progress from precursor adenomatous polyps through adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Endoscopic detection and removal of colorectal adenoma (CRA) could reduce the incidence and mortality risk of CRC, but the recurrence rate is still high. Therefore, chemoprevention is quite important, not only solve the urgent public health problem, but also be cost-effective.
In 2020, the investigators published a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study (NCT02226185) in the Lancet Gastroenterology \& Hepatology. The result concluded that oral BBR for 2 years significantly reduced recurrence after endoscopic removal of CRA (RR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.91; p=0.001). BBR also has a significant preventive effect on all polypoid lesions, including adenomas and serrated lesions (adjusted RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66-0.91; p=0.002) . Does BBR still have a long-term protective effect on the recurrence of CRA after discontinuation? That's what the investigators concerned.
The present study is performed to observe and compare retrospectively the recurrence rate of CRAs in patients of the original BBR RCT study (NCT02226185) within 6 years after discontinuation of medication, including the overall recurrence rate of traditional adenomas within the first year, 1-3 years, 3-6 years, and the entire follow-up period of 6 years. The aim is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of BBR in preventing recurrence and carcinogenesis after endoscopic resection of CRAs.
In 2020, the investigators published a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study (NCT02226185) in the Lancet Gastroenterology \& Hepatology. The result concluded that oral BBR for 2 years significantly reduced recurrence after endoscopic removal of CRA (RR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.91; p=0.001). BBR also has a significant preventive effect on all polypoid lesions, including adenomas and serrated lesions (adjusted RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66-0.91; p=0.002) . Does BBR still have a long-term protective effect on the recurrence of CRA after discontinuation? That's what the investigators concerned.
The present study is performed to observe and compare retrospectively the recurrence rate of CRAs in patients of the original BBR RCT study (NCT02226185) within 6 years after discontinuation of medication, including the overall recurrence rate of traditional adenomas within the first year, 1-3 years, 3-6 years, and the entire follow-up period of 6 years. The aim is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of BBR in preventing recurrence and carcinogenesis after endoscopic resection of CRAs.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: