Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:39 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05897151
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-06-13
First Post:
2023-05-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Sepsis
Sponsor:
Mahmoud Rashad Ahmed
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Study Between Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Patients With Sepsis
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The anesthetic efficacy and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia and comparing it with general anesthesia technique in sepsis diagnosed patient.
Detailed Description:
Hemodynamic instability due to high block largely limits the use of conventional dose spinal anesthesia in high-risk septic patients. Hypotension is more common, and also more hazardous, in septic patients, as they may have decreased physiological reserve and compromised blood supply to various vital organs. A smaller dose of local anesthetic reduces the severity and incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: