Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 9:03 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00937456
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-06-26
First Post:
2009-07-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer
Sponsor:
University Hospital, Lille
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Open vs Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multicentric Phase III Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To compare laparoscopically-assisted gastric mobilization versus open gastric mobilization in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with open thoracic approach in the 2 arms.
Detailed Description:
Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: