Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04686656
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-04-08
First Post:
2020-12-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Nasal Versus Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Sponsor:
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Nasal With Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare to nasal and buccal oxygen administration in patients undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration .
Detailed Description:
Anesthesia for Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) may be range from routine bronchoscopy sedation to general anesthesia. During sedation to EBUS increased duration of anesthesia and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for hypoxic events. To avoid this, oxygen supplementation is mandatory. There are different techniques for oxygen supplementation during the procedure. At this study we will compare to nasal and buccal oxygen supplementations during EBUS.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: