Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 4:02 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-21 @ 6:51 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04246606
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-11-18
First Post:
2020-01-23
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Concordance of the IHC4 Score Performed in Local or Central Laboratory to Endopredict in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Sponsor:
UNICANCER
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Retrospective Study Assessing the Concordance of the IHC4 Score Performed in Local Pathology Laboratory or in a Central Laboratory to a Molecular Gold Standard Test Endopredict in Breast Cancer Infiltrating ER+ HER2-
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
GEFPICS IHC4
Brief Summary:
Retrospective observational, multicentric study assessing the immunohistochemistry (IHC) based test IHC4 score in infiltrating early breast cancer: comparison of the score performed in local laboratory vs in a central laboratory and concordance with a molecular gold standard classifier (EndoPredict).
Detailed Description:
The IHC4 prognostic signature is an algorithm based on a combination of biomarkers evaluated in immunohistochemistry and anatomical-clinical parameters. Immunohistochemistry is routinely performed as a diagnostic procedure for estrogen receptor (ER; H-score 0-300), progesterone receptor (PR; % of marked cells), HER2 (positive vs negative status) and Ki67 (% of marked cells evaluated by counting). Clinical parameters include lymph node status (0N+, 1-3N+, \>3N+, \>3N+), tumour size in mm (≤10mm, 11-20, 21-50, \>50mm), histologic grade (1, 2, 3), patient's age at diagnosis (\<65 years, ≥65 years), and type of treatment (anti-estrogen or aromatase inhibitors).
The method for reading and scoring conditions is very precise and currently guarantee the validity of the test (validated centrally in TransATAC). However, there is not yet an open access web platform available for the calculation of the IHC4 score, due to the prior need for homogenisation of the interpretation of immunochemistry (standardisation of the protocol) to generate a reliable and validated IHC4 under decentralised "real life" conditions. There is currently few published data on the weight of technical parameters (antibody clones, automaton type, etc.) or interpretation methods (scoring) in the calculation of the IHC4 score (IHC4 robustness). However, only one study, published recently, shows a good tolerance of the test to variations in technical protocol or reading.
In this context, a study coordinated by the GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists in breast cancer, has been set up to better define the robustness and the scope of IHC4 score. These project will assess 2 main aspects: (i) validate the local "real life" technique for the calculation of the IHC4 score; and (ii) homogenise the IHC reading method (especially for Ki67), on a cohort of cases from the GEFPICS, tested in a prognostic molecular signatures.
The method for reading and scoring conditions is very precise and currently guarantee the validity of the test (validated centrally in TransATAC). However, there is not yet an open access web platform available for the calculation of the IHC4 score, due to the prior need for homogenisation of the interpretation of immunochemistry (standardisation of the protocol) to generate a reliable and validated IHC4 under decentralised "real life" conditions. There is currently few published data on the weight of technical parameters (antibody clones, automaton type, etc.) or interpretation methods (scoring) in the calculation of the IHC4 score (IHC4 robustness). However, only one study, published recently, shows a good tolerance of the test to variations in technical protocol or reading.
In this context, a study coordinated by the GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists in breast cancer, has been set up to better define the robustness and the scope of IHC4 score. These project will assess 2 main aspects: (i) validate the local "real life" technique for the calculation of the IHC4 score; and (ii) homogenise the IHC reading method (especially for Ki67), on a cohort of cases from the GEFPICS, tested in a prognostic molecular signatures.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: