Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:23 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06056856
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-09-28
First Post:
2023-08-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Anatomical and Functional Outcome of PSG Vs BMG for Urethral Substitution in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures
Sponsor:
Al-Azhar University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Anatomical and Functional Outcome of Penile Skin Graft Versus Buccal Mucosal Graft for Urethral Substitution in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-09
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to compare the penile skin graft and buccal mucosal graft for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach.
Detailed Description:
Since previous studies were:
* Retrospective and very few were prospective randomized studies
* Some studies were done on lichen sclerosis cases that have an adverse effect on the PSG outcome.
* The follow-up duration was longer for PSG patients.
* Stricture length was usually longer for PSG cases.
This study aims to compare the PSG and BMG for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach.
The investigators hypothesize that:
❶ Conducting a well-designed prospective, randomized study can help identify which technique is better than the other.
❷ Using the one-side dorsal approach can improve the outcomes of both techniques and identify their advantages and disadvantages.
* Retrospective and very few were prospective randomized studies
* Some studies were done on lichen sclerosis cases that have an adverse effect on the PSG outcome.
* The follow-up duration was longer for PSG patients.
* Stricture length was usually longer for PSG cases.
This study aims to compare the PSG and BMG for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach.
The investigators hypothesize that:
❶ Conducting a well-designed prospective, randomized study can help identify which technique is better than the other.
❷ Using the one-side dorsal approach can improve the outcomes of both techniques and identify their advantages and disadvantages.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: