Viewing Study NCT05508256


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 11:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-31 @ 6:28 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05508256
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-03-06
First Post: 2022-08-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: CAtheter-Based Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Compared to Conventional Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Sponsor: Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: CAtheter-Based Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Compared to Conventional Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: CABA-HFPEF
Brief Summary: The objective of CABA-HFPEF is to test whether catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).
Detailed Description: HFpEF accounts for approximately half of HF diagnoses and HFmrEF adds another 20%. HFpEF patients are predisposed to AF with a prevalence of AF up to 65%. Conversely, the presence of AF increases the likelihood of subsequent HFpEF by up to 4-fold across diverse populations. The vulnerable hemodynamic state in HFpEF patients due to LV diastolic dysfunction can be significantly affected by AF with loss of atrial contraction and reduction in cardiac output. Thus, presence of AF in HFpEF patients leads to a significant increase in hospitalization, mortality and stroke.

Restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with HFpEF and AF could reduce cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Catheter ablation (CA), particularly when performed as initial rhythm control, results in less recurrences of AF than anti arrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and AF, CA showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality and worsening HF admissions compared to medical therapy.

No randomized clinical trial has tested or is currently testing the effects of CA on CV outcomes in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF and AF. To address this, CABA-HFPEF tests whether CA can improve CV outcomes compared to usual care in these patients. The results of CABA-HFPEF will critically extend the current evidence on ablation-based rhythm control to this large population in dire need for treatments that improve clinical outcomes.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: