Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 9:46 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 10:09 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00962897
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2009-08-20
First Post:
2009-08-19
Brief Title:
Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion
Sponsor:
Texas Vascular Associates
Organization:
Texas Vascular Associates
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Retrospective Review of Randomized Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion With Four Years Followup
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2009-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
A retrospective review with four year followup on patients that had previously been enrolled in a study to evaluate blockages in the lower legs The study looked at patients that had undergone a bypass of the leg from the groin to the knee area with an incision in each area using general anesthesia These patients were compared to others who had undergone treatment with balloon dilatation and stents in the arteries in the thighs with only numbing medicine The study was completed two years ago and was initially designed to look at outcomes at 24 months Now the investigators are trying to go back and look at outcomes of these patients treatment at 4 years by simply reviewing their records
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None