Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:32 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:20 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04892056
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-05-19
First Post:
2021-04-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Two Types of Mechanics
Sponsor:
Future University in Egypt
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The rate of anterior segment retraction in bi-maxillary protrusion cases was evaluated comparing the friction and friction-less mechanics. since, there has been a lack of clear cut guidelines for clinicians for the optimum method for retraction, this randomized clinical trial was done.
Detailed Description:
Thirty bi-maxillary protrusion female patients were randomly allocated into either intervention groups. In the Friction group, retraction was accomplished using elastomeric power chains extending from crimpable hooks distal to the lateral incisors, on 0.017x0.025-inch Stainless Steel wires, to the mini-screws . While in the friction-less group with retraction done using T- loop springs made of 0.017x0.025-inch titanium molybdenum wires. Retraction force was set to 160g per side in both intervention groups. Activation was done every four weeks. Rate of anterior segment retraction was evaluated via digital models.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: