Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 9:44 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 10:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00952250
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2011-12-02
First Post:
2009-08-04
Brief Title:
Targeted Feedback Reports to Improve Acute Coronary Syndromes ACS Care
Sponsor:
Duke University
Organization:
Duke University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Personalized and Targeted Feedback in the ACTION-Registry-GWTG
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2011-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This project is designed to examine the impact of tailored feedback on site performance
The investigators objective is to evaluate whether a personalized and targeted feedback education and performance improvement intervention has a greater impact on adherence to recommended guidelines than standard feedback
The investigators hypothesize that a site-specific report with centrally identified targets for improvement paired with target specific interventions will enable sites to quickly identify and prioritize salient problem areas have ready access to an analysis of factors that underlie problems and formulate an effective action plan The investigators also hypothesize that those hospitals randomized to receive intervention will be more likely to improve their overall performance as well as their target specific performance during the period of observation in direct response to activated QI processes
Outcomes
The primary outcome is improvement in the overall composite of all metrics eligible for intervention regardless of their selection as targets
The secondary outcome is improvement in the composite of targeted metrics
Outcomes will be assessed in all participating sites and in among relevant performance subgroups low performers academic centers full service and among medication versus process metrics
The investigators objective is to evaluate whether a personalized and targeted feedback education and performance improvement intervention has a greater impact on adherence to recommended guidelines than standard feedback
The investigators hypothesize that a site-specific report with centrally identified targets for improvement paired with target specific interventions will enable sites to quickly identify and prioritize salient problem areas have ready access to an analysis of factors that underlie problems and formulate an effective action plan The investigators also hypothesize that those hospitals randomized to receive intervention will be more likely to improve their overall performance as well as their target specific performance during the period of observation in direct response to activated QI processes
Outcomes
The primary outcome is improvement in the overall composite of all metrics eligible for intervention regardless of their selection as targets
The secondary outcome is improvement in the composite of targeted metrics
Outcomes will be assessed in all participating sites and in among relevant performance subgroups low performers academic centers full service and among medication versus process metrics
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None