Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 11:47 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 11:47 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01702116
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2013-04-25
First Post:
2011-08-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Resection For Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Sponsor:
Stony Brook University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Resection For Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2013-04
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a study that compares two types of surgery for rectal cancer. There are two procedures that can be used during this surgery, conventional abdominal resection (APR) and extended (or extralevator) APR. The investigators are doing this research to see whether the extralevator APR increases the likelihood that the edge of the tissue that is removed will be more likely to be free from cancer cells compared with the conventional APR surgery. At this time there is no evidence that one type of procedure is better at this than the other. The objective of this research is to determine whether extralevator APR is more likely to have clean margins (free of cancer) compared to the standard APR surgery.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: