Viewing Study NCT01241916


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-26 @ 11:45 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 11:45 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01241916
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2012-07-03
First Post: 2010-11-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Static-Progressive Versus Dynamic Splinting for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness
Sponsor: Massachusetts General Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Static-Progressive Versus Dynamic Splinting for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2012-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Primary Question: "When splinting is used to improve motion in post-traumatic stiff elbows, is there a significant difference in gains in motion achieved between static progressive or dynamic splint approaches?"

Secondary Question: "Is there a significant difference in patient compliance with static progressive versus dynamic splint use, and does this effect final ulnohumeral motion outcomes?"
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: