Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 11:13 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 5:12 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07131228
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-20
First Post:
2025-08-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Changes in Portal Vein Pulsatility Variability During a Tidal Volume Challenge Can Predict Fluid Tolerance
Sponsor:
Dr. Negrin University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Changes in Portal Vein Pulsatility Variability During a Tidal Volume Challenge Can Predict Fluid Tolerance
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
SERLU
Brief Summary:
In critically ill patients, appropriate fluid administration is one of the cornerstones of hemodynamic management, as both hypovolemia and fluid overload can negatively impact clinical outcomes.
For years, fluid responsiveness-defined as an increase in cardiac output following volume administration-has guided decision-making in the postoperative ICU. However, fluid responsiveness alone does not guarantee fluid tolerance, which refers to the venous system's ability to accommodate volume without developing venous congestion or adverse effects such as pulmonary edema, renal or hepatic dysfunction.
The tidal volume challenge (TVC)-which consists of a transient increase in tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg-has been shown to predict fluid responsiveness by enhancing the hemodynamic interaction between the heart and lungs during the cardiac cycle, as measured through dynamic arterial indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV). However, these indices do not provide information about fluid tolerance or the state of venous congestion.
Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein, specifically the portal pulsatility index (which under normal conditions presents as a continuous waveform due to the damping effects of the hepatic parenchyma and venous compliance), has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of systemic venous congestion. Studies have shown that an increase in the portal pulsatility index following volume loading may indicate the development of venous congestion and, therefore, poor fluid tolerance.
Since the tidal volume challenge transiently increases intrathoracic pressure and allows dynamic evaluation of cardiovascular responses, we propose that this interaction be assessed not only through arterial dynamic indices (which assess responsiveness) but also through changes in venous flow patterns-specifically, variations in portal pulsatility-so that both fluid responsiveness and tolerance can be predicted with the same test.
For years, fluid responsiveness-defined as an increase in cardiac output following volume administration-has guided decision-making in the postoperative ICU. However, fluid responsiveness alone does not guarantee fluid tolerance, which refers to the venous system's ability to accommodate volume without developing venous congestion or adverse effects such as pulmonary edema, renal or hepatic dysfunction.
The tidal volume challenge (TVC)-which consists of a transient increase in tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg-has been shown to predict fluid responsiveness by enhancing the hemodynamic interaction between the heart and lungs during the cardiac cycle, as measured through dynamic arterial indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV). However, these indices do not provide information about fluid tolerance or the state of venous congestion.
Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein, specifically the portal pulsatility index (which under normal conditions presents as a continuous waveform due to the damping effects of the hepatic parenchyma and venous compliance), has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of systemic venous congestion. Studies have shown that an increase in the portal pulsatility index following volume loading may indicate the development of venous congestion and, therefore, poor fluid tolerance.
Since the tidal volume challenge transiently increases intrathoracic pressure and allows dynamic evaluation of cardiovascular responses, we propose that this interaction be assessed not only through arterial dynamic indices (which assess responsiveness) but also through changes in venous flow patterns-specifically, variations in portal pulsatility-so that both fluid responsiveness and tolerance can be predicted with the same test.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: