Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:29 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 1:24 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03989856
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2019-06-18
First Post:
2019-06-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing Versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy.
Sponsor:
Ain Shams University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing Versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2019-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Eolsb
Brief Summary:
In women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy which is less harmfull on the ovarian reserve (electrocoagulation or suturing).
Detailed Description:
The aim of the present study was to determine which hemostatic procedure (hemostatic suture or electrocautery) may be less harmful after laparoscopic cystectomy, based on the longterm status of the ovarian reserve.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: