Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:29 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05549856
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-09-23
First Post:
2022-09-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Sponsor:
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Official Title: Dry Suction Technique Versus Wet Suction Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-09
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Studies have shown that the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNA generates better histological diagnostic accuracy and specimen quality than the dry-suction technique. However, studies on wet suction on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB is small and the conclusions are controversial. Besides, the optional numeber of passes for EUS-FNB has not been determined.
Detailed Description:
The investigators aimed to design a large multicenter randomized trial to compare the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal number of passes required for EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic lesions using 22G Franseen under wet aspiration versus standard aspiration.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: