Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 10:56 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 12:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04662008
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-03-31
First Post:
2020-12-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Offering Support and Electronic Resources for Care Partners of Those With Multiple Sclerosis
Sponsor:
Case Western Reserve University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
CLOSER_MS: Communicating With Local or Distance Caregivers Offering Support and Electronic Resources
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study is an enhancement of the Fatigue Management Programs for People with MS study (NCT03550170). The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of two interventions delivered remotely to support unpaid caregivers (UC) of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). We hypothesize that a high resource intervention will be significantly better than a lower resource intervention in terms of the primary outcome (UC anxiety, depression, and stress) and secondary outcome (COVID specific anxiety).
Detailed Description:
UCs are often caring for persons with chronic disabling conditions, who are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 illness. This presents incredibly stressful situations for UCs, which can result in depression, anxiety, and worse health outcomes both for them and their care recipients. Until a vaccine becomes available, these demands will force UCs to provide more support, whether in-person or remotely, for persons with MS. The aim of this study is to compare 2 modes of supporting UCs of people with MS. We will compare the effectiveness of a high resource highly tailored intervention that includes tele-coaching intervention (delivered via videoconference or phone) + web site information to a low-resource web-site only intervention. Our primary outcomes are UC anxiety, depression, and stress (DASS-42 scale) and a secondary outcome is COVID specific anxiety (CAS scale). These 2 interventions were selected because they will inform administrators and clinicians on whether a resource-intensive or a low-resource intervention is needed to yield meaningful outcomes. The comparison will also help UC decide how they should spend their limited time. These interventions are relevant to UCs of people with MS because of their need for tailored information provided in flexible ways to promote learning and support.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: