Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 9:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04253795
Status:
SUSPENDED
Last Update Posted:
2020-04-30
First Post:
2020-01-23
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
Sponsor:
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Study of Nonintubated Anesthesia With Laryngeal Mask Versus Intubated Anesthesia With Double Lumen Tube in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
Status:
SUSPENDED
Status Verified Date:
2020-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
not recruiting, awaiting for changes in IRB
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare to the patients undergoing nonintubated general anesthesia with laryngeal mask and undergoing intubated general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation in Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
Detailed Description:
Although general anesthesia with double-lumen intubation is generally mandatory for Video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures intubation with double lumen tube is related to several risks. Nonintubated general anesthesia with laryngeal mask in patients with spontaneous breathing may be an alternative choice for minor VATS procedures.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: