Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:25 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:10 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04794556
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-03-15
First Post:
2021-03-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Respiratory Protection Effect of Ear-loop-type KF94 Mask
Sponsor:
Samsung Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Respiratory Protection Effect of Ear-loop-type KF94 Filtering Facepiece Respirators According to the Wearing Method: A Randomized, Open-label Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Ear-loop-type Korean Filter 94 masks (KF94 masks, equivalent to the N95 and FFP2) are broadly used in health care settings in Korea for the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no studies have assessed the adequacy of respiratory protection. In this prospective randomized open-label study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the fitting performance of ear-loop-type KF94 masks by the quantitative fit test according to the occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) protocol. In addition, by quantitatively comparing the "tight-fitting" method using a clip and the "general-fitting" method, the investigators tried to evaluate whether the tight-wearing method improves the fitting performance of KF94 masks.
Detailed Description:
Sample size: The sample size was calculated based on a pilot study of 10 participants, which examined the FF of general-fitting. The mean FF was 20.3, and the log-transformed FFs were assessed due to skewed data, which was 1.98 (standard deviation 1.34). We assumed that the FF for tight-fitting would increase by 50%, with an α value of .05, and a β error of .10 (power = 90%) for two-sided hypothesis testing. The estimated sample size calculation revealed a required sample of 24 participants. Therefore, 30 participants were enrolled to account for a 20% dropout rate.
Data analyses: Repeated-measures analysis of variance or generalized estimating equations were used to compare the FFs or passing rate of the QNFTs for the three mask types according to the wearing method. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the FFs according to the wearing method for each mask type. McNemar's test was used to compare the passing rate of the QNFT according to the wearing method. Bonferroni's correction was performed for all results of each subgroup analysis. SAS ver. 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform all statistical analyses.
Data analyses: Repeated-measures analysis of variance or generalized estimating equations were used to compare the FFs or passing rate of the QNFTs for the three mask types according to the wearing method. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the FFs according to the wearing method for each mask type. McNemar's test was used to compare the passing rate of the QNFT according to the wearing method. Bonferroni's correction was performed for all results of each subgroup analysis. SAS ver. 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform all statistical analyses.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: