Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:10 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03965156
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-10-17
First Post:
2019-05-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Bilateral Ultrasound Guided ESP Block Versus TAP Block on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Sponsor:
Zagazig University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
* Abdominal hysterectomy is an open surgical procedure associated with considerable post-operative pain. Narcotics are often required during patient recovery but can result in adverse side effects. Transversus abdominis plane block(TAP block) is a regional anesthetic technique that is found to be effective as post-operative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Recently, erector spinae plane block(ESP)block is found to be safe, and simple regional anesthetic technique that decrease total opioid consumption in patient undergoing breast, or abdominal surgery.
* The aim is to compare the efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia, and their need for opioid.
Hypothesis
* Null hypothesis (H0): No difference between the analgesic effects of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
* Alternative hypothesis (H1): There are difference between the analgesic effects of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
* The aim is to compare the efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia, and their need for opioid.
Hypothesis
* Null hypothesis (H0): No difference between the analgesic effects of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
* Alternative hypothesis (H1): There are difference between the analgesic effects of bilateral erector spinae plane block, and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients after abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
Detailed Description:
Sample size: Assuming that Mean±SD of reduced pain scores in erector spinae plane block is 4.7±3.7 versus 2.5±1 in transversus abdominis plane block.So, the total sample size is 48 cases (24 in each group) using Open Source Statistics for Public Health (open Epi) with confidence interval 95% and power of test is 80%.
d) Method of sample collection:
Forty eight female patients will be divided into two groups by a computer-generated randomization table:
Group (ES) (n=24): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with each block 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) at the level of T9.
Group (TA) (n=24): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block with each block 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).
d) Method of sample collection:
Forty eight female patients will be divided into two groups by a computer-generated randomization table:
Group (ES) (n=24): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with each block 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) at the level of T9.
Group (TA) (n=24): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block with each block 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: