Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:09 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00713856
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2010-10-19
First Post:
2008-07-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Conventional and Custom Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
Sponsor:
University of Utah
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Conventional and Custom With Iris Registration PRK Ablations: Assessment of Visual Function and Patient Satisfaction
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The study objective is to compare the clinical outcomes using wavefront guided PRK with iris registration and conventional laser PRK using FDA-approved laser technology on the same patient.
Detailed Description:
Patients undergoing bilateral PRK on the same day will have one eye randomly assigned to custom wavefront guided PRK and the fellow eye treated with conventional PRK.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: