Viewing Study NCT07016828


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-26 @ 10:36 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-29 @ 2:21 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT07016828
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-06-12
First Post: 2025-06-03
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Guided Pterygoid Implant
Sponsor: Fayoum University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparing Accuracy of Pterygoid Implants Placement Using Computer-guided Surgical Templates Versus Free Hand Technique
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Introduction \& Background Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction leads to significant bone loss, complicating prosthetic rehabilitation. Traditional bone grafting methods, though effective, involve long healing times and risks. Pterygoid implants offer a graft-free alternative by engaging dense bone structures like the pterygoid process. However, their placement is technically challenging due to limited visibility and proximity to critical structures. Computer-guided surgery may improve accuracy and reduce complications compared to freehand techniques.

Research Question Does computer-guided surgery enhance the accuracy of pterygoid implant placement in atrophic maxillae compared to freehand techniques? Aim To compare the accuracy of computer-generated 3D surgical guides versus freehand placement of pterygoid implants.

Hypothesis

* H0: No difference in accuracy between techniques.
* Hₐ: there is difference between two techniques Study Design A prospective randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation) with 12 implants (6 per group(.

Patient Selection Inclusion Criteria: Severe posterior maxillary atrophy (Cawood \& Howell V-VI), residual bone height \<4mm, age 21-75.

Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications for surgery, uncontrolled systemic diseases, or acute sinus infections.

Methods

* Group A: Implants placed using CBCT-based 3D surgical guides.
* Group B: Freehand placement based on anatomical landmarks.
* Primary Outcome: Implant position accuracy (postoperative CBCT vs. virtual plan(.
* Secondary Outcomes: Surgical time, complications, and stability. Surgical Procedure
* Osteotomy: Angled drilling (45-60°) into the pterygoid process.
* Implant Placement: Torque ≥30 Ncm for primary stability.
* Postoperative Care: Antibiotics, analgesics, and follow-up CBCT at one week. Statistical Analysis Data analyzed using SPSS, with G\*Power determining sample size (85% power, α = 0.05(.

Ethical Considerations Approved by institutional review boards, with informed consent and confidentiality maintained.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: